The number that moves you up a tier
Most players assume a VIP ladder rewards winning. It does not. The metric that matters is turnover: the total amount wagered, win or lose, over a fixed period. A losing month can push a player up a tier faster than a winning one, because the scheme is measuring volume of play, not net result. Monoaud's VIP page is where a reader finds which metric applies to their account, how it is calculated, and over what window it is measured. The first thing to confirm is not the name of the top tier but the unit being counted.
Across operators, the usual candidates are total stakes, rake paid, or a points system where each unit of wagering converts to points at a rate printed in the terms. Some schemes count only certain games at full value; table games often contribute less than slots, and some games may contribute nothing at all. If Monoaud's page lists contribution rates per game category, that table is the single most important item on the page. A player who wagers heavily on a game that contributes at ten percent will climb ten times slower than the headline rate suggests.
| Item to confirm | Why it can change | Where it is stated |
|---|---|---|
| Metric counted (stakes, rake, points) | Operators switch between turnover and rake models between scheme versions | VIP terms, first section |
| Contribution rate per game category | Slots commonly contribute fully; table games and live dealer often less | Contribution table on the VIP page or linked terms |
| Qualification window | Monthly, quarterly and rolling windows produce different tier retention | Eligibility clause |
| Downgrade rule | Some schemes freeze a tier, others drop it after inactivity | Maintenance or downgrade section |
| Benefit delivery mechanism | Manual credit, automatic credit and opt-in all differ | Benefit terms |
The qualification window deserves more attention than it usually gets. A monthly window resets progress to zero every thirty days; a rolling window keeps the player perpetually defending the last thirty days of activity. A quarterly window gives more time but also more distance between the player and the next tier. Monoaud's page should state which model applies, and if it does not, the absence is itself a warning: a scheme that does not define its window can redefine it without notice.
What rakeback returns
Rakeback is the most concrete benefit a VIP tier can offer, and the most misunderstood. It is not a refund of losses. It is a return of a portion of the fee the operator takes on each bet or hand, and it is paid whether the player won or lost. A player who wins over a period still receives rakeback, because the fee was taken from their action, not from their result. The percentage returned is always a fraction of the fee, never a fraction of the stake, and the distinction matters when comparing schemes.
The second thing to understand is that rakeback is usually credited, not paid in cash. It may arrive as bonus funds with their own wagering requirement, as loyalty points convertible at a stated rate, or as withdrawable cash. These are not equivalent. Bonus funds with a wagering multiple are a conditional liability, not a payment; the player must wager them several times over before they become withdrawable. If Monoaud's page describes a rakeback rate, the reader should look immediately for the form in which it is credited and the conditions attached to that form.
There is also the question of whether rakeback is paid on gross rake or net rake. Gross rake is the full fee taken on the player's action; net rake subtracts bonuses, chargebacks, or other adjustments before the percentage is applied. The difference can be substantial. A scheme that advertises a high percentage on net rake may return less than a lower percentage on gross rake. The terms, not the marketing line, decide which one applies.
Why a stated benefit can be discretionary
Almost every VIP scheme contains a clause that makes the benefits discretionary. The operator reserves the right to alter, suspend or withdraw any benefit at any time, for any reason or none. This is not a defect in Monoaud's scheme; it is the standard architecture of tiered loyalty programmes across the industry. The reason is structural: a VIP scheme is a marketing instrument, not a contract of deposit. The player does not buy a tier; they qualify for it by their play, and the operator retains the right to change what the tier means.
That does not make the scheme worthless, but it changes what a reader should treat as real. A benefit that is stated as an entitlement in the terms — a fixed rakeback percentage, a defined withdrawal priority — is more durable than a benefit described as an invitation, a possibility, or a subject to availability. Personal account managers, event invitations, and customised gifts are almost always discretionary. They may be withdrawn without notice, and their value cannot be compared across operators because they are not standardised.
The practical reading rule is simple: if the Monoaud page describes a benefit without stating the conditions under which it is granted, maintained and withdrawn, the reader should assume it can change. The only binding version is the terms page, and even that is subject to the operator's right to amend. What a reader can do is check whether the page distinguishes between automatic benefits and discretionary ones, and whether the discretionary ones are clearly labelled as such.
Which terms to read before chasing a tier
Chasing a tier is a financial decision, not a game decision. The player is committing to a volume of wagering in exchange for benefits whose value is partly fixed and partly discretionary. Before making that commitment, a reader should extract four items from Monoaud's VIP page and its linked terms.
First, the contribution rates per game category. If the player's preferred game contributes at a reduced rate, the effective cost of the tier is higher than the headline threshold suggests. Second, the form of each benefit. Cash is worth more than bonus funds; bonus funds with a low wagering multiple are worth more than the same amount with a high one. Third, the downgrade rule. A scheme that strips the tier after one inactive month is a treadmill; a scheme that freezes it is a one-time climb. Fourth, the opt-in requirement. Some schemes require the player to activate the VIP status or the individual benefit before it applies; failing to opt in is the most common way players forfeit value they had already earned.
There is also the question of what the scheme does to the player's incentives. A tier ladder that rewards turnover rewards longer sessions and larger stakes. That is the point of the scheme from the operator's side. The reader should understand that the expected loss on the wagering required to reach a tier is almost always larger than the value of the tier itself. The scheme is not a way to win; it is a way to lose less on the volume the player would have wagered anyway. If the player would not have wagered that volume without the tier, the tier is not a benefit.
What the page cannot tell you
Some things are simply not on the page, and their absence is information. If Monoaud's VIP page does not state the metric being counted, the reader cannot know whether their play is being measured at all. If it does not state contribution rates per game, the headline tier thresholds are uninterpretable. If it does not state the form in which benefits are credited, the value of the scheme cannot be calculated. If it does not state the downgrade rule, the player does not know what they are defending.
None of these absences are unusual. Many operators publish a marketing page that names the tiers and lists the benefits without the terms that govern them. The terms are usually on a separate page, linked from the VIP page or buried in the general terms and conditions. The reader's job is to find that page and read it before depositing with the intention of climbing. A VIP page without linked terms is a brochure, not a document.
FAQ
Does Monoaud's VIP scheme reward winning?
No. Tiered loyalty schemes measure turnover — the total amount wagered — not net result. A player can lose heavily and climb quickly, or win and climb slowly, depending on the volume of their play and the contribution rates applied to their games.
Is rakeback the same as a refund?
No. Rakeback is a return of a portion of the fee the operator takes on each bet or hand, paid whether the player won or lost. It is usually credited as bonus funds with a wagering requirement, not as withdrawable cash, and the terms state which form applies.
Can Monoaud change the VIP benefits after a player reaches a tier?
Yes. VIP schemes are marketing instruments, and the operator typically reserves the right to alter, suspend or withdraw benefits at any time. Benefits stated as fixed entitlements in the terms are more durable than those described as invitations or subject to availability.
What should a reader check before chasing a tier?
Four items: the contribution rate for their preferred games, the form in which each benefit is credited, the downgrade rule after inactivity, and whether an opt-in is required. The expected loss on the wagering needed to reach a tier is usually larger than the tier's value.
This page is an independent summary of how tiered VIP schemes work as a mechanism, it is not published by Monoaud, and it states no figure or status for them; the operator's own VIP page and linked terms are the only binding source.
Play responsibly
Gambling should be treated as paid entertainment, never as a way to earn income or recover losses. 1-800-MY-RESET (1-800-697-3738)
18+ or 21+ depending on where you are; follow the minimum age that applies to you.
This article is general information about how these mechanics work. It is not legal advice and not a recommendation to gamble or to use any particular operator. Availability and legality differ by jurisdiction — check the rules that apply where you are.
