The decision a VIP page forces on a player
A player who opens Quick's VIP page is usually deciding one thing: whether the next tier is worth the turnover it takes to reach it. The page presents a ladder, and every rung on that ladder is a promise conditioned on something the player must do first. The promise is a benefit; the condition is turnover. The page is the only place where the two are bound together in Quick's own words, and the reader's job is to find the binding terms rather than the marketing copy.
A VIP scheme is not a reward for winning. It is a reward for volume. A player who deposits, loses, and leaves may never see a tier rise; a player who cycles the same bankroll through enough wagers may climb quickly. The scheme measures action, not outcome. That single fact changes how every benefit on the page should be read: the value of a tier is the value of the benefits minus the expected cost of the turnover required to reach it, and the page states only the first half of that equation.
What the tier ladder is measuring
Every tiered loyalty scheme measures one quantity, and the VIP page usually names it in the small print near the tier table. The quantity is turnover: the total amount wagered, not the amount deposited and not the amount won or lost. A player who deposits a sum and wagers it once has produced turnover equal to that sum. A player who deposits the same sum and wagers it twenty times has produced twenty times the turnover, regardless of whether the balance went up or down along the way.
Three consequences follow, and each one changes what the tier table means.
First, turnover is a flow, not a stock. The tier is not a balance that sits in an account; it is a meter that resets, usually on a monthly or quarterly cycle, and the page states the cycle somewhere near the tier thresholds. If the meter resets, a tier earned this month is not owned forever. Second, turnover is asymmetric: it rises with every wager but falls only when the operator's own rules say it falls, and many schemes do not let it fall at all within a cycle. Third, turnover is not profit. A player can produce enormous turnover while losing steadily, and the VIP page is designed to make that path look attractive.
| Item to confirm | Why it can change | Where it is stated |
|---|---|---|
| The quantity measured (turnover, rake, points) | Operators rename the metric or switch between turnover and rake between cycles | The definition clause near the tier table, usually in a footnote or a linked terms section |
| The reset cycle | Monthly, quarterly, and rolling windows are all common, and a scheme may move between them | The VIP page's own terms block, often under a heading like "How tiers are earned" |
| The threshold for each tier | Thresholds are adjusted when the operator rebalances the scheme | The tier table itself, but the binding figure is the one in the linked terms, not the graphic |
| Whether wagering on all games counts equally | Table games, live dealer games, and some slots commonly contribute at different rates or not at all | A contribution-rate table, usually below the tier table or in a separate terms page |
| What happens to a tier at the end of a cycle | Some schemes downgrade, some freeze, some restart from zero | The cycle and downgrade clause in the VIP terms |
The tier table on Quick's VIP page is a summary. The binding version of every threshold and every condition is the linked terms document, and the two can disagree. Where they disagree, the terms document controls, and the reader should treat the tier table as an illustration until the terms confirm it.
Rakeback and what it returns
Rakeback is the most common headline benefit on a VIP page, and it is also the most commonly misread. Rake is the house's cut on each wager, taken either as a percentage of the stake or as a percentage of the expected loss. Rakeback returns a portion of that cut to the player. It is not a bonus added on top of winnings; it is a partial refund of a cost the player has already paid, and it is usually credited only after the wager has settled.
Two numbers govern rakeback, and neither is the percentage printed in large type. The first is the base: rakeback is a percentage of the rake, not of the stake and not of the loss. A player who sees a headline rate and assumes it applies to their total wagered amount will overestimate the return by an order of magnitude. The second number is the settlement rule: rakeback is typically credited on a fixed schedule, often weekly or monthly, and only for wagers that have fully settled. Open wagers, voided wagers, and wagers on excluded games commonly earn nothing.
Across operators, rakeback rates commonly range from a low single-digit percentage of rake to somewhere in the low double digits, with higher tiers earning more. The figure Quick applies to any given tier is stated on the VIP page or in its linked terms, and it is the only figure that binds. The reader's job is to find the base definition first: a rate on rake, a rate on turnover, and a rate on net loss are three different things, and the page usually states which one it means in a single line of small print.
Rakeback is also conditional in a second way. Most schemes require the player to opt in, or to maintain a minimum activity level, or to have no active bonus that conflicts. A player who assumes rakeback is automatic may wager for a full cycle and receive nothing because the opt-in box was never ticked. The VIP page states the opt-in requirement, but it is often placed after the benefit list, where a reader skimming the headline rates will not see it.
Why a stated benefit can be discretionary
Not everything on a VIP page is a contractual promise. A tiered loyalty scheme typically divides its benefits into two classes, and the distinction is the most important thing on the page. The first class is mechanical: rakeback, cashback, and anything else calculated by a formula and credited automatically. These benefits are governed by the terms, and if the terms state a rate and a settlement rule, the operator is bound to apply them.
The second class is discretionary: a dedicated account manager, faster withdrawals, event invitations, gifts, and anything described with words like "may", "at the operator's discretion", or "subject to availability". These benefits are not rights. They are privileges the operator can grant, withhold, or withdraw without breaching anything, and the VIP page usually signals this with a single sentence near the bottom. A player who chases a tier for the account manager and discovers that the account manager is a shared inbox has not been cheated; they have misread the page.
The practical test is simple. For each benefit on the tier table, the reader should ask whether the page states a formula or a person. A formula is binding; a person is discretionary. "Cashback of X percent credited weekly" is a formula. "Dedicated account manager" is a person. "Faster withdrawals" is neither, and it is the most dangerous item on the page because it sounds mechanical but is almost always discretionary in practice.
| Benefit type | How to tell them apart | What it means for the player |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical (rakeback, cashback) | A rate, a base, and a settlement rule are all stated | Binding if the terms confirm it; the player can calculate the return |
| Discretionary (account manager, gifts, events) | Words like "may", "at discretion", or "subject to availability" | Not a right; can be granted or withheld without breach |
| Hybrid (faster withdrawals, priority support) | A comparative word with no stated standard | Usually discretionary in practice; the comparison has no fixed baseline |
The absence of a formula is itself information. If Quick's VIP page lists a benefit without a rate, a base, or a settlement rule, the reader should treat that benefit as discretionary regardless of how it is presented. What the page does not state is as important as what it states.
Which terms a reader should look for before chasing a tier
Chasing a tier means producing turnover, and producing turnover costs money. The cost is the house edge on every wager made along the way, and the VIP page never states that cost. It states the benefits. The reader who wants to know whether the next tier is worth it must assemble the equation from pieces scattered across the page and its linked documents.
The first piece is the contribution rate. Not every wager counts equally toward the turnover requirement, and some wagers count not at all. A scheme that excludes table games or live dealer games from contribution is effectively a slots-only scheme, and a player who prefers blackjack will find the tier much more expensive than the tier table suggests. The contribution table is usually a separate block, and it is the single most important item on the page for anyone planning to reach a tier through a specific game.
The second piece is the wagering requirement attached to any benefit that is credited as a bonus. Rakeback and cashback are usually credited as withdrawable cash or as bonus funds, and the distinction matters. Bonus funds carry a wagering requirement: the player must wager the bonus amount a stated number of times before it can be withdrawn. The multiple is stated in the bonus terms, not on the tier table, and it can turn a seemingly valuable benefit into a liability. A cashback payment that must be wagered many times over before withdrawal is not cashback; it is a conditional voucher.
The third piece is the downgrade rule. A tier earned this month may not survive the next cycle, and the page states the downgrade rule somewhere in the terms. Some schemes downgrade one tier per inactive cycle; some drop to the bottom; some freeze the tier for a grace period. The reader who plans to take a break should know which rule applies before the break, because the tier they return to may not be the tier they left.
The fourth piece is the exclusion list. Every VIP scheme excludes something: certain games, certain bet types, certain payment methods, certain jurisdictions. The exclusion list is usually in the linked terms rather than on the VIP page itself, and it is the item most often missed. A player who produces turnover entirely through excluded wagers has produced nothing toward the tier, and the page will not warn them until the cycle ends and the tier does not rise.
Where each item is stated on Quick's site
The VIP page itself is the entry point, but it is rarely the binding document. The binding terms live in a linked page, usually titled something like "VIP Terms", "Loyalty Scheme Rules", or "Bonus Policy", and the tier table on the VIP page is a summary of that document. The reader should treat the VIP page as an index: it shows what exists, and the linked terms show what binds.
The contribution table, if it exists, is usually placed below the tier table or in a collapsible section. The reset cycle and the downgrade rule are usually in the first block of the linked terms. The rakeback base definition is usually a single sentence near the rakeback rate. The opt-in requirement is usually near the bottom of the VIP page, after the benefit list. The exclusion list is usually in the linked terms, not on the VIP page at all.
If any of these items is absent from both the VIP page and its linked terms, the reader should treat the benefit it governs as unstated. An unstated contribution rate means the reader cannot know what counts toward a tier. An unstated reset cycle means the reader cannot know how long a tier lasts. An unstated rakeback base means the headline rate is meaningless. The absence is the answer: where the page does not state the mechanism, there is no mechanism to rely on.
FAQ
Does a VIP tier reward winning or wagering?
It rewards wagering. The tier rises with turnover, not with profit, and a player who wagers heavily while losing will climb faster than a player who wins a large sum and stops. The VIP page states the turnover definition, and the reader should confirm it before assuming anything about what the tier measures.
Is rakeback the same as cashback?
Not necessarily. Rakeback returns a portion of the rake, which is the house's cut on each wager. Cashback usually returns a portion of net losses over a period. They are calculated on different bases, and the VIP page states which base applies to each benefit. A rate on rake and a rate on net loss produce very different amounts.
What happens to my tier if I stop playing for a month?
It depends on the downgrade rule. Some schemes downgrade one tier per inactive cycle, some drop to the bottom, and some freeze the tier for a grace period. The rule is stated in the VIP terms, not on the tier table, and the reader should find it before taking a break.
Do all games count equally toward a VIP tier?
Usually not. Table games, live dealer games, and some slots commonly contribute at different rates, and some contribute nothing. The contribution table is the item to find, and it is usually below the tier table or in the linked terms. A player who wagers only on excluded games produces no progress toward the tier.
This page is an independent summary of how tiered loyalty schemes work as a mechanism, it is not published by Quick, and it states no rate, threshold, or tier name for Quick; the operator's own VIP page and its linked terms are the only binding source for those figures.
Play responsibly
Gambling should be treated as paid entertainment, never as a way to earn income or recover losses. 1-800-MY-RESET (1-800-697-3738)
18+ or 21+ depending on where you are; follow the minimum age that applies to you.
This article is general information about how these mechanics work. It is not legal advice and not a recommendation to gamble or to use any particular operator. Availability and legality differ by jurisdiction — check the rules that apply where you are.
