APRZ unraveled almost as soon as trading began. On-chain records cited in the source show that the ApeMars token plunged on June 7, 2026, dropping from about $0.005800 to $0.000003200 within minutes, a collapse of 99.95%. By June 9, DexScreener showed the APRZ/WETH pair on Uniswap with only $1.4K in liquidity, a market cap near $75K, and a 39.77% decline over 24 hours.
A launch day pop was followed by a near-instant breakdown
The timeline in the source is built from public chain data. APRZ went live on Uniswap at 08:00 UTC on June 6, opening near $0.00584, close to the project’s stated listing target of $0.0055. ApeMars had run a 24-stage presale with a final presale price of $0.00012506, raising $532,969.34 from 1,884 participants.
Less than a day later, the chart broke down. According to DexScreener data referenced in the material, a huge red candle appeared between 06:10 and 07:00 UTC on June 7. In a five-minute window around the crash, only 11 trades were visible. The source says Bitcoin was holding steady at the time, which points to an isolated collapse in APRZ rather than a broad market move.
Official X account went dark while Telegram stayed active
The project’s official X account, @ApemarsOfficial, was suspended on the same day as the crash. No explanation followed. No team member surfaced publicly. On June 8, the claim page at apemars.com was still displaying “Mission Complete — Claim Incoming,” while the Telegram admin continued posting standard welcome GIFs. Liquidity had already dropped to $21.2K by then and kept shrinking.
By June 9, the pair looked almost inactive: $2.5K in 24-hour volume, 91 total transactions since launch, 43 buyers, and 24 sellers. Buy volume stood near $1.1K against $1.3K in sell volume. That is a market with little depth and limited exit capacity.
The biggest question is the gap between funds raised and liquidity left
The source centers its accountability question on one figure. ApeMars raised $532,969.34 in the presale, yet the project put less than $50K into Uniswap liquidity on listing day. As of June 9, only $1.4K remained in the pool. Using the figures in the report, that leaves roughly $531,569 not reflected in current liquidity.
No public allocation breakdown was published. The SolidProof audit covered the token contract, not presale fund management. The team was anonymous, with no identified founders or legal entity listed in the material. The source mentions possible explanations such as operating costs, internal team handling, or an exit scenario, but it also makes clear that none of those can be confirmed without disclosure from the team.
The contract may be intact, but the market is effectively drained
On the contract side, the source says APRZ is verified on Etherscan at 0xaab17f1fccea5be51f6e2a5254927e06b06a985f and ownership has been renounced. The audit reportedly found no mint function and no blacklist. That means the token contract itself is not described as a direct wallet-draining risk. The problem is liquidity, not a contract exploit against holders.
As of June 9, APRZ was quoted around $0.000001754. With only $1.4K in liquidity, the source notes that a $700 sell order could move the price sharply. At that level, a wallet holding 1,000,000 APRZ would show a paper value of roughly $1.75, but realizing even that amount would be difficult in such a thin market.
At the time covered by the material, the team had issued no public statement on the crash, the suspended X account, or the handling of presale funds. The on-chain record is visible. Team communication is not.