Apple ordered to pay more than $5.7 billion in Taction patent case, plans appeal

Apple ordered to pay more than $5.7 billion in Taction patent case, plans appeal

N
News Editor
2026-09-28 11:08:01
A federal jury in San Diego ruled on Sept. 28 that Apple must pay more than $5.7 billion to Taction Technology for infringing touch technology patents, setting what the report described as the largest patent damages award in U.S. history. The case began in 2021, when Taction accused Apple of infringing patents through iPhone and iPad products. Although a trial judge dismissed the case in 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit later revived it, leading to a new trial and the latest jury verdict. According to the report, jurors found that Apple improperly benefited from Taction’s technological innovation and commercial results by selling infringing touch-enabled devices. During the litigation, Apple’s technology chief argued that the company’s haptic engine was fundamentally different from Taction’s technology, and early evidence on that point had been accepted by the district court. Even so, the jury ultimately sided against Apple. Apple said it disagrees with the decision and will appeal. A company spokesperson called the damages figure completely unsupported by the facts and said testing presented during trial showed differences between the two technologies. The report also noted Apple’s earlier patent dispute involving two Apple Watch models that were forced off shelves in 2025 over blood oxygen technology.

Apple has been ordered to pay more than $5.7 billion to Taction Technology after a federal jury in San Diego found that the company infringed touch technology patents. The award, according to the report, is the largest patent damages verdict in U.S. history.

The jury said Apple improperly benefited from Taction Technology’s innovation and commercial work by selling infringing touch-enabled devices. During the case, Apple’s technology chief argued that the haptic engine used in its products was "fundamentally different" from Taction’s technology. The San Diego district court had accepted an initial round of evidence supporting that position, but the jury still returned a majority verdict against Apple.

Case timeline: filed in 2021, revived after dismissal

Taction Technology first sued Apple in 2021, alleging patent infringement across the iPhone and iPad product lines. A trial judge dismissed the case in 2023, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit later reversed that decision and reinstated the lawsuit. After the case was reheard, the jury delivered its verdict on Sept. 28.

Damages far exceed the prior record cited in the report

The report said the previous U.S. record for patent damages was a $13.4 million payment from Texas Instruments to Philips in 2019. On that basis, the more than $5.7 billion awarded in this case is about 42.5 times larger. The article also said the amount is roughly equivalent to NT$20 billion for Apple.

Apple says the award has no factual basis

Apple pushed back on the ruling. A company spokesperson said the jury’s damages figure was "completely unsupported by the facts" and added that testing presented by Taction during trial showed that the two technologies were different. Apple said it will appeal.

Another patent dispute for Apple

The report said this is not the first time Apple has faced consequences in a patent fight. It referenced an earlier case in which two Apple Watch models were forced off the market in 2025 after the U.S. International Trade Commission blocked them over blood oxygen patent infringement. The article framed that dispute as another sign of intensifying competition around touch and sensing technologies.

What comes next

Taction Technology argued that the patents at issue cover touch technology used broadly across the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch lines. Given Apple’s annual sales volume in the tens of millions of devices, the report said per-device infringement damages could add up quickly. It also noted that the final amount could still be reduced if Apple succeeds on appeal.

The article added that the case may serve as a reference point for patent strategy in the technology sector, especially for smaller startups seeking to protect core technology and pursue litigation after market adoption has been established.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
100

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.