Arbitrum Approves 30,765 ETH Release, but $71 Million Recovery Fund Faces Court Fight

Arbitrum Approves 30,765 ETH Release, but $71 Million Recovery Fund Faces Court Fight

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-22 13:40:13
Arbitrum DAO voted to release 30,765 ETH for users hit by the Aave exploit, but the funds remain tied up in a Manhattan federal court dispute.
ArbitrumAaveETHDeFihack

Arbitrum DAO has approved the release of 30,765 ETH, worth about $71 million by the report’s estimate, to compensate users harmed in the April 18 Aave exploit. On-chain voting closed Friday Hong Kong time, with more than 90% of participants backing the move.

The ether had been frozen by the Arbitrum Security Council after the attack. According to the source material, the attackers used unsupported rsETH as collateral and withdrew around $230 million in ETH from Aave. The frozen funds were designated for a joint recovery effort involving Aave, KelpDAO, LayerZero, EtherFi, and Compound, with the stated goal of reimbursing affected users.

Federal court dispute now stands in the way

The vote does not mean the ETH will be released right away. The assets are now part of an active legal dispute in federal court in Manhattan. Last week, attorney Charles Gerstein filed a restraining notice against Arbitrum DAO on behalf of families holding roughly $877 million in unpaid terrorism compensation judgments against North Korea, arguing that the funds belong to the regime. That position is tied to widespread suspicions that the hack was carried out by the Lazarus cyber group.

Aave’s side asked earlier this week for the restriction to be lifted, saying the assets should go back to innocent users rather than North Korea. It also warned that a drawn-out case could create liquidity problems across DeFi markets. Gerstein has taken the opposite view, arguing that the matter is fraud rather than theft because the attackers allegedly obtained ownership by posting worthless collateral.

Eight-day delay leaves room for intervention

Under Arbitrum’s protocol rules, the governance decision cannot be executed for at least eight days. That delay is meant to leave time for any possible court action. The proposal also highlights legal protections for the Arbitrum Foundation, Offchain Labs, Security Council members, and governance delegates against claims tied to either freezing or releasing the funds. The vote settled one issue, but not the legal risk.

Speaking at the Consensus event in Miami, Aave Labs Head of Legal and Policy Linda Jeng said the incident has already changed how the platform evaluates risk. She said collateral standards are being revised to cover not only financial metrics but also cybersecurity, interoperability, and technical infrastructure reviews.

Jeng said, “During the financial crisis, we had to rescue banks. Now, as an ecosystem, we’ve come together to rescue ourselves.” The final outcome now depends on how the Manhattan federal court handles the dispute.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
100

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.