Australia Court Fines BPS Financial A$14M for Unlicensed Qoin Wallet and Misleading Claims

Australia Court Fines BPS Financial A$14M for Unlicensed Qoin Wallet and Misleading Claims

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-23 20:45:16
The Federal Court of Australia has imposed A$14 million in penalties on BPS Financial for operating the Qoin Wallet without a license and making deceptive claims, alongside a 10-year ban on licensed financial services.
BPS FinancialQoin WalletASICAustralia crypto regulationmisleading advertising penalties

Australia’s corporate watchdog, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), has secured a major court win against BPS Financial Pty Ltd. The Federal Court ordered the company to pay A$14 million (approximately $9.3 million) in penalties for running the Qoin Wallet product without a required license and for misleading users. Justice Downes described the conduct as “serious and unlawful misconduct,” noting senior management involvement and inadequate compliance systems.

Two-and-a-half years of unlicensed operation

ASIC’s investigation revealed that between January 2020 and mid-2023, BPS Financial issued the Qoin Wallet and provided financial services linked to its Qoin digital token without holding an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). The court found the product functioned as a non-cash payment facility, yet the company failed to meet mandatory licensing obligations. For this unlicensed conduct alone, the court imposed a penalty of A$1.3 million.

Inflated liquidity and false merchant acceptance claims

The larger penalty came from misleading representations. BPS claimed during promotions that the Qoin Wallet had official approval or registration, that Qoin tokens could be easily exchanged for fiat or other crypto assets, and that the token was widely accepted by merchants across Australia. These statements were later rejected by the courts on appeal, with judges ruling that they significantly overstated the token’s liquidity and real-world usability. For these deceptive practices, the court handed down an additional A$8 million fine.

ASIC Chair Joe Longo stressed afterwards: “Licensing safeguards are essential for high-risk crypto products.” He noted that consumers had relied on unclear and inaccurate information, and that regulatory action was needed to protect retail users.

10-year ban and broader operational impact

Beyond the financial penalty, the court imposed a 10-year restriction on BPS Financial, barring the company from operating any licensed financial services. This effectively locks the firm out of Australia’s digital finance sector for a decade. Additionally, BPS must publish court-ordered notices on its Qoin Wallet app and website to warn existing and potential customers, and must pay most of ASIC’s legal costs.

Meanwhile, ASIC is updating its broader digital asset framework. Recent exemptions have simplified stablecoin and wrapped token distribution, reducing some licensing burdens while maintaining record-keeping oversight. In its “Key issues outlook 2026” report, the regulator also flagged opaque private credit exposure, superannuation failures, high-risk investment sales, AI-related consumer harm, and fintech regulatory gaps.

The BPS Financial case signals a firm enforcement stance. Crypto and payment firms now face escalating pressure to align innovation with licensing, disclosure, and compliance requirements.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
600

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.