Balancer Co-Founder Proposes Wind-Down of Protocol, Says V3 Revenue Fell Short

Balancer Co-Founder Proposes Wind-Down of Protocol, Says V3 Revenue Fell Short

N
News Editor
2026-09-14 23:57:43
Balancer Labs co-founder Marcus Hardt said on X that he has submitted a governance proposal to gradually wind down Balancer, arguing that the protocol’s revenue has not developed as hoped despite a completed restructuring. According to Hardt, the project had already halted token emissions, redirected all protocol fees to the DAO, cut its operating budget by one-third, and reduced the team from about 25 people to 12.5 full-time equivalents. Those cost-side measures were carried out as planned, he said, but revenue did not follow. Hardt said most of Balancer’s protocol revenue still comes from v2, while v3 revenue has not grown enough to replace it. He also said earlier security incidents have continued to weigh on partners’ willingness to adopt v3. In his view, there is no funded path currently visible that could change the situation, and continuing to spend treasury funds would not be reasonable. He added that Balancer’s code would remain open-source, allowing other teams to fork it and keep building. The proposal has been posted to the governance forum and still requires tokenholder approval. It also outlines a treasury distribution in kind for BAL holders, valued at at least $9 million, along with a timeline covering contributor notice, pool withdrawals, redemption rounds, an airdrop, final liquidation, and a Snapshot vote scheduled for Sept. 25-29.

Balancer Labs co-founder Marcus Hardt said on X that he has submitted a governance proposal to gradually wind down Balancer.

Hardt said Balancer had already completed a restructuring that included halting token emissions, routing all protocol fees to the DAO, cutting the operating budget by one-third, and reducing the team from about 25 people to 12.5 full-time equivalents. He said the restructuring went as planned on the cost side, but revenue did not meet expectations.

V3 revenue has not replaced v2

According to Hardt, most of Balancer’s protocol revenue still comes from v2, and v3 revenue has not grown to a level that can replace it. He also said earlier security incidents continue to affect partners’ willingness to adopt v3.

Hardt said he no longer sees a funded path that could change the situation, and that continuing to use treasury funds would not be reasonable. For that reason, he proposed a gradual shutdown of Balancer and said he will not lead any plan to keep the protocol operating.

Code will remain open-source

Hardt said Balancer’s code will remain open-source, and other teams would be able to fork it and continue development. The proposal has already been submitted to the governance forum, while the final decision will still be made by tokenholders.

Treasury distribution and voting schedule

According to the proposal, the treasury will be distributed in kind on a pro rata basis to BAL holders and is currently valued at at least $9 million. The BIP-919 buyback would be canceled, and BIP-687 would be replaced.

  • The contributor notice period runs through Oct. 31, 2026.
  • Pools will become withdrawal-only on Oct. 30.
  • The first distribution round will begin at the end of May 2027, with holders burning BAL to receive a share of the treasury.
  • The second round will take the form of an airdrop to addresses that redeemed in the first round, to be carried out within two months after the deadline.
  • Final liquidation will take place six months later.

The Snapshot vote is scheduled for Sept. 25-29.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.