Broxus CEO Vlad Ponomarev recently appeared on a cryptocurrency news podcast to discuss Everscale and the infrastructure being built around the network. In the interview, Everscale was presented as a highly scalable DeFi-focused blockchain, with a stated capacity of more than 1 million transactions per second, alongside fast settlement and fractional transaction fees.
What the Everscale ecosystem includes
The discussion highlighted that Everscale is being positioned as more than a high-throughput base layer. Its ecosystem also includes a cross-chain bridge platform built around a Universal Bridge mechanism designed to move liquidity to and from virtually any network. In addition, the network features a native decentralized exchange, staking and farming pools, and native wallets intended to support broader on-chain activity.
The native DEX was described as offering some of the higher APY opportunities in DeFi through staking and farming products. However, no exact yield figures were provided in the source material, so any assessment of return potential depends on later disclosures and live platform data.
Broxus’ role in development
Ponomarev leads Broxus, described in the source as one of the core development teams behind the Everscale network. Broxus is also identified as an architect of the network’s cross-chain bridge platform and native DEX. According to the profile included in the article, Ponomarev brings more than 10 years of experience in commercial strategy, B2B sales, and marketing.
The broader message from the interview is that Broxus is trying to combine scalability at the network level with practical DeFi tools at the application layer. In that framework, the Universal Bridge is presented as a key component for improving capital mobility across chains and expanding Everscale’s role in multi-chain liquidity flows.
Context around the interview
The original piece notes that the appearance was part of a sponsored podcast series. That means the claims around throughput, bridge design, and ecosystem advantages should be understood primarily as public statements from the project side. For market participants, further evaluation would likely require reviewing on-chain usage, product performance, and any available security or audit information.