China put 221,900 AI short dramas online in H1, with 98.7% ending in the red

China put 221,900 AI short dramas online in H1, with 98.7% ending in the red

N
News Editor
2026-09-08 08:03:13
China’s AI short-drama boom produced 221,900 titles in the first half of 2026, but nearly all of them lost money, according to statistics cited by The Paper. The report said 98.7% of the works were unprofitable even after generating a combined 515.738 billion views, showing that traffic alone did not translate into returns. On average, only one out of every 77 titles was able to cover its costs. DataEye vice president Lin Qiwen said many industry participants had expected AI to lower production barriers, but the same shift also caused creators to lose money faster. DataEye’s report showed AI live-action-style dramas surged from March, with their share of new releases nearing 65% at one point. Yet audience traction weakened, with the category’s share of total views falling from a peak of 80% to 68% in June. The expansion also coincided with a sharp decline in live-action short dramas. New live-action releases on the Hongguo short-drama monthly ranking dropped from 432 in February to 110 in June. Regulators have moved on both fronts: China’s National Radio and Television Administration published a support plan for premium live-action micro dramas on May 14, backed by at least 6 billion yuan from six major platforms, while also introducing review requirements for AI short-drama output through separate rules.

China’s AI short-drama market expanded rapidly in the first half of 2026, but the output did not bring broad profitability. Statistics cited by The Paper showed that 221,900 AI short dramas went online during the period, and 98.7% of them ended up losing money.

By that calculation, only one out of every 77 titles was able to cover its costs. The report described an industry running on extreme volume while leaving most participants without returns.

Massive viewing figures failed to convert into profits

The 221,900 titles generated a combined 515.738 billion views in six months, but that audience scale did not convert into earnings for most producers.

Lin Qiwen, vice president of Chinese ad placement analytics firm DataEye, said many practitioners believed AI would lower the barrier to production. In his view, that same dynamic also caused creators to lose money faster.

AI live-action-style dramas cooled after an early surge

DataEye said AI live-action-style short dramas began to surge in March, and the format’s share of new releases at one point approached 65%.

Viewer demand, however, did not keep pace with the rise in supply. The share of total views taken by live-action-style AI dramas once climbed to 80%, then fell back to 68% in June, down about 12 percentage points from the high. The report said audiences were showing fatigue with increasingly similar AI-generated faces.

Live-action short dramas also came under pressure

The older live-action short-drama business was hit as well. On the Hongguo short-drama monthly ranking, the number of new live-action titles dropped from a February peak of 432 to just 110 in June, a decline of more than 60%.

Audience structure shifted at the same time. According to the report, viewers of AI short dramas and animated short dramas rose from 120 million last year to 600 million, while live-action short dramas had 251 million viewers. The gap widened over the course of six months.

Regulatory review rules and support measures moved in parallel

As pressure on the live-action film and television sector grew, China’s National Radio and Television Administration on May 14 released the Implementation Plan for the Creation and Distribution of Premium Micro Short Dramas. Under that plan, six key platforms will invest at least 6 billion yuan to support high-quality live-action micro short dramas.

At the same time, authorities also used the Measures for the Development and Management of Micro Short Dramas to set review checkpoints for AI short-drama output, putting scrutiny on one side and support on the other.

The report’s conclusion was that low-cost replication, once treated as the sector’s defensive advantage, is no longer enough. Making a drama is no longer the difficult part. The harder question now is whether audiences are willing to watch it, and how platforms will carry out the review responsibilities set by regulators.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
900

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.