Citadel Pushes for Stricter DeFi Oversight, Blockchain Association Fires Back: Don't Label Protocol Developers as Brokers

Citadel Pushes for Stricter DeFi Oversight, Blockchain Association Fires Back: Don't Label Protocol Developers as Brokers

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-23 01:50:15
Citadel Securities urges the SEC to tighten DeFi regulation; the Blockchain Association objects, arguing DeFi developers shouldn't be classified as brokers. SEC Chair Atkins proposes an 'innovation exemption' sandbox.
DeFi regulationCitadel SecuritiesBlockchain AssociationSECinnovation exemption

Citadel Securities earlier this week urged the SEC to impose stricter oversight on DeFi protocols, arguing these protocols essentially function as exchanges that match buyers and sellers through algorithms. Citadel called on the SEC to move away from current exemptions and push for broadly debated legislation. The Blockchain Association quickly fired back in a letter dated April 6.

The Association stated plainly: developers behind DeFi protocols should not be classified as brokers or exchange operators. Those definitions, the group argued, were crafted for human-directed intermediaries under existing law and are ill-suited for decentralized, automated financial systems. The Association said: “We believe the Commission should move forward within the framework of the innovation exemption advocated by Chair Atkins’ staff. As with past financial technology advances, tokenized securities transactions should also be eligible for regulatory exemptions.”

SEC Chair Atkins Pushes Innovation Exemption Sandbox

SEC Chair Paul Atkins recently announced the agency’s plan to seek public input on new regulatory initiatives, notably a proposal for an “innovation exemption” — a regulatory sandbox for on-chain assets. This move aims to help regulators keep pace with rapid technology changes and allow innovative financial solutions to be tested.

Companies are increasingly exploring tokenization technologies that enable trading assets like shares on the blockchain. These systems promise faster, more efficient transaction processing, potentially reshaping financial markets. So far, the SEC has granted limited approvals for select platforms such as Nasdaq to experiment with tokenized securities. The agency, however, consistently underlines that such instruments still fall within the definition of securities and must comply with existing laws.

Infrastructure vs. Intermediary Debate

The Blockchain Association contends that traditional securities rules were intended to oversee intermediaries, not neutral infrastructure providers. Imposing full regulatory requirements on software developers or validation mechanisms would introduce unnecessary burdens and stifle innovation. The Association added: “Validators, smart contracts, non-custodial software, and other blockchain-based tools only provide new forms of financial infrastructure — they do not become regulated intermediaries by nature of their design.”

As DeFi evolves, the Association maintains that the SEC historically has exercised ample authority to grant exceptions where justified. The group emphasized the need to extend this pragmatic flexibility as tokenization matures. The Association also argued that Citadel's procedural demands amount to a delay tactic, warning that an overly lengthy regulatory process would disadvantage both investors and the pace of financial innovation.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.