Crypto Market Sees $115M in Liquidations Over 24 Hours: Long and Short Positions Nearly Equal, Bitcoin vs. Ethereum Show Divergence

Crypto Market Sees $115M in Liquidations Over 24 Hours: Long and Short Positions Nearly Equal, Bitcoin vs. Ethereum Show Divergence

N
News Editor
2026-06-28 00:01:11
According to Coinglass data, the total liquidation volume across the crypto market reached $115 million in the past 24 hours, with long liquidations of $57.31 million and short liquidations of $57.27 million being nearly identical. Bitcoin short liquidations ($16 million) significantly exceeded longs, while Ethereum long liquidations ($17.37 million) surpassed shorts, indicating divergent market sentiment between the two largest assets. A total of 55,741 traders were liquidated, with the largest single order occurring on Binance’s ETHUSDT pair worth $1.8876 million. This liquidation event highlights the risks of leveraged trading in volatile conditions and urges traders to monitor open interest and funding rates.

24-Hour Liquidation Overview

According to data from Coinglass, the total liquidation volume across the entire cryptocurrency market over the past 24 hours reached $115 million. Long liquidations accounted for approximately $57.31 million, while short liquidations stood at $57.27 million, resulting in a net gap of only about $40,000. This near-perfect balance reflects intense short-term tug-of-war between bulls and bears. The liquidation events affected a total of 55,741 traders, with the largest single liquidation order occurring on Binance’s ETHUSDT pair, valued at $1.8876 million. The data suggests that under tightening liquidity conditions, highly leveraged positions are highly susceptible to being wiped out by short-term price swings, and traders need to be cautious about potential cascading liquidations.

Divergence Between Bitcoin and Ethereum Liquidations

Looking at individual assets, Bitcoin saw long liquidations of $10.21 million and short liquidations of $15.99 million, indicating that short traders suffered heavier losses, likely due to a temporary upward price movement that forced shorts to cover. In contrast, Ethereum showed the opposite pattern: long liquidations of $17.37 million versus short liquidations of $13.51 million, meaning longs bore the brunt of the damage, suggesting a downward price move for ETH. This stark divergence in liquidation structures reveals a clear split in market sentiment between Bitcoin and Ethereum, with capital flows and leverage directions moving in opposite directions. Such divergence often signals a period of heightened uncertainty and potential sector rotation within the crypto market.

Market Sentiment and Lessons from Leverage Liquidations

The $115 million total liquidation over 24 hours is moderate compared to recent market standards, but the exceptionally narrow net difference between long and short liquidations underscores a state of high uncertainty and intense back-and-forth between buyers and sellers. In a macro environment where sentiment is fragile and volatility remains elevated, high-leverage contracts face significant tail risks. Traders should closely monitor open interest changes, funding rates, and the basis of perpetual swaps — these metrics can provide early warnings of accumulating liquidation pressure. This liquidation event serves as a reminder that even large-cap cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum can trigger cascading liquidations under extreme volatility. Risk management, rather than direction prediction, remains the key to surviving such market conditions.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
400

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.