Viewpoint: Curve still leads in stablecoins, but new rivals and team concerns cloud the outlook

Viewpoint: Curve still leads in stablecoins, but new rivals and team concerns cloud the outlook

N
News Editor
2026-07-21 17:57:41
A Q&A-style article published by Foresight revisits three separate topics: Curve’s current position in DeFi, the author’s posting schedule, and Machi’s history in crypto. On Curve, the piece argues that the protocol still holds a leading position in the stablecoin segment if judged on ecosystem standing alone. But it also says the competitive picture has changed as Uniswap and Spark push ahead with products built around V4 Hook-based innovation, creating pressure that Curve had not faced in the same way before. The article adds that team quality remains central to long-term protocol durability. In the author’s view, even strong moats can erode without sustained maintenance and execution. It also suggests that if the “Clarity Act” passes, a wave of new off-exchange stablecoins could enter the market, opening fresh opportunities that competitors may be better positioned to capture. As one example, the author points to a platform launched by Spark and Uniswap, noting that while its current stablecoin coverage is limited, it already supports a stablecoin issued by Paypal. In separate answers, the author says weekend and holiday breaks were adopted after 2022 or 2023 to spend more time on long-term thinking and reduce the impact of short-term price swings. The piece also says Machi launched projects during the ICO and DeFi booms, including Cream, but became most widely known for buying large amounts of Bored Ape NFTs before later losing that accumulated wealth in trading.
CurvestablecoinsUniswapSparkV4 HookMachiBored Ape

In a Q&A article published by Foresight, the author addressed Curve’s development, the reasoning behind a weekday-only publishing routine, and Machi’s path through the crypto market.

Curve still leads in stablecoins, but the competitive field is changing

On Curve, the author said that if team issues are set aside and the ecosystem is viewed on its own, the protocol still holds a leading position in the stablecoin sector. Even so, with Uniswap and Spark expanding products through V4 Hook-driven innovation, Curve has now run into strong competitors. In the author’s telling, that is not a situation Curve had faced in earlier stages of its development.

Once team factors are included, the author said the outlook becomes harder to trust.

The article argues that most projects do not have an unbreakable moat. Even where an advantage has been built, it can weaken over time if nobody keeps maintaining and reinforcing it. That kind of upkeep, the author wrote, depends on having a reliable team, which is why any long-term assessment of a project has to include the people running it.

Curve had a strong start, according to the piece, but without continued work and careful management from a dependable team, its existing edge can be chipped away bit by bit.

The author also offered one reason Curve has managed to stay near the top of the stablecoin market over the past several years: most of the existing stablecoins appeared before Curve did. When Curve arrived, it targeted those assets and served them well, which helped it build a strong position in the market that already existed.

That setup may not hold indefinitely. The article says that, especially if the “Clarity Act” passes, a large batch of new off-exchange stablecoins could enter the market. In the author’s view, that would create new openings and could also give Curve’s competitors a chance to reverse the balance in the stablecoin market.

As an example, the author pointed to a platform launched by Spark and Uniswap. At this stage, the platform does not support many stablecoins, the piece said, but one clearly visible listing is a stablecoin issued by Paypal. The author described that as a signal that the two are aiming at a new market and new categories of assets.

Under those conditions, whoever captures the new opening may be able to secure share in that next market. The article says that outcome, too, would depend on having a strong team.

Why the author no longer updates on weekends and holidays

Responding to a question about why updates are largely limited to Monday through Friday, with breaks on weekends and public holidays, the author said that before 2023, or perhaps before 2022, the goal had generally been to publish every day whenever possible.

That later changed. The reason for taking weekends and holidays off, the author said, was to leave more time for thinking about longer-term pictures and to reduce the negative effect of short-term market swings, especially price fluctuations.

After making that adjustment, the author wrote, there was much less focus on short-term market moves, and it became more natural to look at issues, development, and patterns from a longer-term perspective.

On Machi: project launches, Bored Apes, and losses in trading

When asked whether Machi had made a great deal of money during the 2017 ICO wave, the author replied that Machi did launch projects during that boom and also launched Cream during the DeFi wave. Those projects, the article said, later saw little follow-through.

The piece describes Machi’s most successful and best-known move in crypto as buying a large amount of Bored Ape NFTs during the peak of market momentum. According to the author, that trade built substantial wealth, brought him unusual visibility, and turned him into a figure who broke beyond the usual crypto circle.

Still, the article says that the accumulated gains were ultimately all lost in trading. Looking back at Machi’s later decisions, outsiders may easily imagine that if he had stopped then and avoided more speculation, he could have simply lived off that fortune.

The author rejected that line of thinking and paraphrased a remark attributed to Duan Yongping: “In the end, everyone becomes the kind of person he was bound to become.”

Disclaimer

The article closes with a standard warning that markets carry risk and investors should act with caution. It says the piece does not constitute investment advice, and readers should judge whether any opinions, views, or conclusions fit their own circumstances and bear responsibility for decisions made on that basis.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.