David Sacks calls AI extinction narrative a political campaign ahead of Trump meeting with AI executives

David Sacks calls AI extinction narrative a political campaign ahead of Trump meeting with AI executives

N
News Editor
2026-09-29 05:08:40
David Sacks used the latest episode of the All-In Podcast to attack the recent wave of discussion around runaway AI and human extinction, calling it a media and political operation aligned with Democratic goals. Sacks said the public was being pushed to accept a policy path of stopping all AI development, and argued that so-called doomer groups had already laid the groundwork for that message. The conversation then turned to a proposal backed by Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders to restrict superintelligence, which Sacks said could create a chilling effect strong enough to stall AI development in the United States. He also argued that Democrats would treat AI the way they previously treated the crypto industry, driving founders and companies overseas. Jason Calacanis said firms and developers would likely move to jurisdictions such as Singapore and Switzerland if the US banned this class of software. Chamath Palihapitiya added that a regulatory pause could lock in the current market structure and concentrate economic gains among a small group of left-leaning frontier AI companies. The debate is now moving into Washington, where Trump and House Speaker Johnson are scheduled to meet AI executives on September 29 at the White House.

On the latest episode of the All-In Podcast, David Sacks, chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, and host Chamath Palihapitiya described the recent surge in debate over runaway AI and "human extinction" as a public narrative serving Democratic political goals.

Sacks said that over the past few weeks, some people had tried to convince the public that AI would lead to human extinction and, from there, build support for a policy line centered on "stopping all AI development." He said so-called doomer groups had already prepared the ground for that narrative.

The discussion then turned to Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders and a proposal to restrict superintelligence. Sacks argued that the definitions involved and the criminal penalties attached to them would create a powerful chilling effect and leave AI development in the US at a standstill. He added that Democrats would push AI innovators and companies overseas, just as he said they had previously done with the crypto industry.

Sacks also said AI infrastructure had become an important engine of US economic growth, and that slowing AI investment and construction would weaken the economic performance of the Trump administration at the same time.

Angel investor Jason Calacanis backed that view, saying that if the US directly banned this category of software, companies and developers would look to more permissive jurisdictions such as Singapore and Switzerland.

Palihapitiya said that if regulation used a "pause button" to freeze the current industry structure, a small number of left-leaning frontier AI companies would capture most of the economic upside, then use charitable foundations, political action committees, and political donations to help Democrats gain more power.

The argument is now moving into the center of Washington policymaking. Trump and House Speaker Johnson are scheduled to meet AI company executives on September 29 to discuss how to balance AI development and regulation. Frontier model safety, open-source models, data center construction, and the boundaries of regulation are expected to be central topics.

The meeting is expected to take place at about 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time in the East Room of the White House.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.