Dormant Ethereum Wallets Lose Nearly $800K as Bitmine Adds 162,088 ETH to Staking

Dormant Ethereum Wallets Lose Nearly $800K as Bitmine Adds 162,088 ETH to Staking

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-23 18:50:15
Several long-inactive Ethereum wallets were drained in a suspected private-key exploit, with losses nearing $800,000. At the same time, Bitmine expanded its staking position by 162,088 ETH.
Ethereumwallet securityETH stakingBitmineon-chain security

Several long-dormant Ethereum wallets have been drained in a suspected exploit, with reported losses approaching $800,000. Blockchain analysts said a number of old addresses suddenly moved funds after years of inactivity, and some of the wallets had reportedly shown no activity for more than a decade. Investigators are still tracing the flows. Early analysis points to compromised private keys.

The incident does not appear to involve Ethereum’s core network or a smart contract flaw. The reported weakness is tied instead to legacy wallet setups. Older wallet generators may have relied on weaker sources of randomness, making private keys easier to predict or crack over time. The stolen funds were then routed through cross-chain services including THORChain, a move that can make transaction trails harder to follow.

Legacy wallet security returns to the spotlight

A private key is the secret needed to control crypto funds, so once that key is exposed, assets can be moved directly. Many early users created wallets offline and left them untouched for years. That worked in a different era. It also left a trail of aging wallets that may no longer meet current security standards.

Modern wallet tools generally use stronger encryption and hardware-based protection, but older storage methods do not become safer with time. This case puts attention back on self-custody hygiene, especially for long-term holders who may still have funds in wallets generated under outdated conditions.

Bitmine sharply expands its ETH staking position

At the same time, institutional positioning around Ethereum moved in the opposite direction. Bitmine Immersion Technologies, chaired by Tom Lee, added 162,088 ETH, a purchase valued at about $366 million according to the source material. On-chain data cited from Lookonchain confirmed the move.

Bitmine now has 4,194,029 ETH staked, worth nearly $9.48 billion. That accounts for 82.59% of its total ETH holdings. The company is described as following a treasury approach similar to MicroStrategy: accumulate crypto on balance sheet and generate yield through staking. Its stated annual yield target is between 3% and 5%, and it aims to serve institutional clients.

The report also said Bitmine controls roughly 10.5% of Ethereum’s total staked supply. That is a large concentration and shows how visible institutional participation has become in the ETH staking market.

Security concerns rise while institutional conviction holds

These developments landed at the same time but point in different directions. The wallet-draining case has revived concerns about old storage tools, dormant balances, and private-key practices. Discussion across the crypto community has turned back to cold storage methods and security reviews.

Yet the Bitmine expansion sends a separate message. Large-scale staking removes part of the supply from circulation and keeps attention on Ethereum as a yield-bearing network asset. Based on the source material, traders appeared cautious rather than panicked, with no clear panic selling directly linked to the exploit. Security anxiety is up. Institutional demand is still visible.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
100

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.