Cambridge study says Ethereum nodes remain concentrated in the U.S. and EU while post-Merge power use stays far below prior levels

Cambridge study says Ethereum nodes remain concentrated in the U.S. and EU while post-Merge power use stays far below prior levels

N
News Editor
2026-07-16 14:51:59
New research from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that about 31% of Ethereum node activity is located in the United States, while roughly 39% sits in the European Union excluding the U.K., pointing to a geographic footprint that remains concentrated in Western countries. The study’s lead researcher, Alexander Neumuller, said node distribution is not concentrated in a single country, but the network still relies heavily on a small group of cloud providers, including Hetzner, Amazon Web Services and OVH. The report also highlighted a key operational threshold for Ethereum: the network does not need half of validators to fail before trouble begins, and finalization may stop if more than one-third of validators go offline at the same time. Separately, the study revisited Ethereum’s energy profile after The Merge, estimating annual electricity consumption at about 7.9 GWh, or around 1 megawatt of continuous power, equal to about 0.02% of pre-Merge levels. That implies a decline of roughly 99.98%, with sustainable energy use now above 56%, according to the report.
EthereumNodesCambridge Centre for Alternative FinanceEthereum FoundationThe MergeEnergy ConsumptionCloud Providers

A new study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that about 31% of Ethereum node activity is located in the United States, while roughly 39% is distributed across the European Union excluding the U.K. The findings indicate that Ethereum’s node geography remains concentrated in Western countries.

Lead researcher Alexander Neumuller said node distribution is not concentrated in any single country. Even so, the network depends heavily on a small number of cloud service providers, including Hetzner, Amazon Web Services and OVH.

Node distribution and network resilience

The report said Ethereum does not need half of its validators to fail before the network runs into trouble. If more than one-third of validators go offline at the same time, the chain may be unable to complete checkpoint finalization.

Neumuller added that nodes and validators do not map one-to-one. A single node can run multiple validators, which means it is still not possible to precisely determine the real impact that an outage at a specific node or service provider would have on the validator network.

Fresh estimate of post-Merge energy use

The research also revisited Ethereum’s energy consumption after The Merge. It estimated current annual energy use at about 7.9 GWh, equivalent to around 1 megawatt of continuous power. That is about 0.02% of the pre-Merge level, implying a drop of roughly 99.98%.

According to the report, more than 56% of the Ethereum network’s energy mix now comes from sustainable sources, above the global average.

Client concentration remains a risk

Beyond geography and cloud dependence, the study said concentration in client software is another potential vulnerability. A bug in a dominant client could affect a large share of network participants.

The report was released by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance with support from the Ethereum Foundation.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.