Hotel Public WiFi Led to $5,000 Crypto Wallet Hack via Man-in-the-Middle Attack

Hotel Public WiFi Led to $5,000 Crypto Wallet Hack via Man-in-the-Middle Attack

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-22 16:40:13
A crypto holder lost about $5,000 after connecting to hotel public WiFi and discussing crypto in public, leading to a man-in-the-middle attack that hijacked wallet permissions.
public WiFi securitycrypto wallet hackman-in-the-middle attackcryptocurrency securityhacker attack

A cryptocurrency holder lost approximately $5,000 after connecting to a hotel's public WiFi and discussing crypto assets in a public setting. The hacker used a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack to inject malicious code into a web page, tricking the victim into signing a permission grant rather than a transaction. The wallet was drained days later, including SOL, various tokens, and NFTs.

How the MITM Attack Worked

Public WiFi networks typically lack strong isolation between devices, allowing attackers to intercept and modify traffic. The victim connected to the hotel's free WiFi, which required only a captive portal. While browsing, a seemingly legitimate website was infected with malicious code. The attacker listened in on a phone call where the victim discussed crypto with a friend, identifying the target as a crypto holder using Phantom wallet.

Deceptive Permission Request

The victim was using Jupiter Exchange, a decentralized exchange, to swap tokens. The malicious code replaced the legitimate swap request with a wallet authorization prompt. Mistaking it for part of the normal Jupiter workflow, the victim approved the request. In reality, it granted a third-party address permission to control the wallet. The attacker waited until after check-out to execute the theft.

Lessons Learned

The victim admitted multiple mistakes: using hotel public WiFi instead of a mobile hotspot; discussing crypto holdings in public; and approving a wallet request without verifying details. The wallet was a hot wallet used for daily operations, not the main storage. Still, the loss of $5,000 was painful. The incident underscores the risk of public WiFi for crypto users and the importance of scrutinizing every wallet authorization request, no matter the platform.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
700

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.