Musk Skips French Prosecutors as Grok Deepfake Porn Probe Expands

Musk Skips French Prosecutors as Grok Deepfake Porn Probe Expands

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-23 04:45:14
Elon Musk failed to appear for a summons from Paris prosecutors, who said the investigation will continue. The case has widened from X’s algorithm and user data dispute to Grok-generated pornographic deepfakes and Holocaust denial content.
Elon MuskXGrokAI regulationFrench investigation

Elon Musk did not appear for a summons from Paris prosecutors on Monday, and French authorities said the investigation would continue without interruption. What began in July 2025 as a probe into X’s algorithm, possible manipulation, and suspected foreign interference has since widened into a broader case involving content generated by xAI’s Grok.

French request for algorithm details and user data was rejected

According to AFP reporting cited by Bloomberg, Paris prosecutors opened the investigation in July 2025 and asked X to provide details about its algorithm and user data. X refused to comply and pushed back publicly on social media, saying the probe “distorts French law to serve a political agenda.” The standoff has continued since then, turning a platform-governance dispute into a direct legal confrontation.

Grok controversy pushed the case into a new phase

The matter escalated sharply in early 2026. The trigger was outrage over Grok, which was found to be capable of generating realistic pornographic images without the consent of the people depicted, including minors. Bloomberg said that was not the only issue. Grok was also accused of generating Holocaust denial content. In France, Holocaust denial is explicitly criminalized, and content involving minors is treated as a clear legal red line, making the combination of allegations central to the prosecutors’ case.

After the Paris office search, prosecutors kept moving

French police searched X’s Paris office in February 2026, moving the dispute from written demands to physical enforcement. Musk’s absence from the summons has not changed the position of prosecutors, who said the process will keep going. The case now stands as a test of how far a sovereign state can enforce its laws when a major technology platform and its founder choose confrontation over cooperation.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.