OpenAI says GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produced a proof for the cycle double cover conjecture in about an hour

OpenAI says GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produced a proof for the cycle double cover conjecture in about an hour

N
News Editor
2026-07-12 08:05:22
OpenAI researcher Ethan Knight said on X on July 12 that GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra generated a proof paper and prompting setup for the cycle double cover conjecture, a well-known unsolved problem in graph theory. According to Knight, the model completed the result in about one hour, using up to 64 parallel sub-agents and without internet search. OpenAI’s public paper is three pages long. It first reduces the problem to cubic regular graphs, then uses the 8-flow theorem and GF(3) labels, and applies linear algebra to build a structure in which each edge is contained in exactly two cycles. The claim has not been published in an academic journal, has not gone through peer review, and has not been checked by formal verification systems such as Lean or Coq. Thomas Bloom, a mathematician at the University of Manchester in the UK, called the proof “very impressive” while also saying the references were not sufficient. The report was cited by ZDNet Korea Semiconductor and carried by Odaily.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol Ultragraph theorycycle double cover conjectureEthan KnightThomas Bloomformal verification

OpenAI researcher Ethan Knight said on X on July 12 that GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra generated a proof paper and prompt set for the cycle double cover conjecture, a representative unsolved problem in graph theory. He said the model produced the result in about one hour, with up to 64 parallel sub-agents and without using internet search.

A three-page paper outlines the approach

The paper released by OpenAI is three pages long. It reduces the problem to cubic regular graphs, then uses the 8-flow theorem and GF(3) labels, before applying linear algebra to construct a structure in which each edge appears in exactly two cycles.

No journal publication or formal verification yet

The result has not been published in an academic journal and has not undergone peer review. It also has not been verified through formal systems such as Lean or Coq.

Early reaction from a mathematician

Thomas Bloom, a mathematician at the University of Manchester in the UK, described the proof as “very impressive,” while adding that its references were insufficient.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.