Perplexity wins early appeal against Amazon over AI shopping agent Comet

Perplexity wins early appeal against Amazon over AI shopping agent Comet

N
News Editor
2026-08-05 20:16:03
Perplexity scored an early court win after a federal appeals court overturned an order that had blocked its AI shopping tools on Amazon. The Ninth Circuit said Amazon is unlikely to prevail on its claim under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the federal anti-hacking statute at the center of the dispute. The case turns on whether Perplexity’s Comet browser improperly accessed Amazon or whether it was Amazon users themselves, acting through an AI agent, who were using the platform. Amazon has argued that Comet disguised automated traffic, broke its terms of service, and accessed customer accounts without authorization. Perplexity has said the tool acts only with user permission and relies on credentials stored on users’ own devices. While the underlying lawsuit is still moving forward, the ruling offers an early signal of how courts may treat autonomous AI agents that browse websites, log into accounts, and make purchases for users.

A federal appeals court has overturned an order that blocked Perplexity’s AI shopping tools on Amazon, giving the startup an early win in a case that could shape how autonomous AI agents are allowed to interact with online platforms.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday that Amazon is unlikely to succeed on its claim under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, or CFAA, a federal anti-hacking law.

In the ruling, the court said that to prevail under the CFAA, a plaintiff must show that a defendant intentionally accessed a computer without authorization or exceeded authorized access, obtained information from a protected computer, and caused losses totaling at least $5,000 to one or more people during a one-year period.

The panel said it was Amazon’s users, not Perplexity, who accessed the platform through Comet, Perplexity’s agentic AI browser. According to the report, Comet can browse websites, log into accounts, and make purchases on a user’s behalf.

The dispute started in November

The fight began in November, when Amazon sent Perplexity a cease-and-desist letter before filing suit.

Amazon alleged that Comet disguised automated traffic as a standard web browser, violated the company’s terms of service, and accessed customer accounts without authorization.

Perplexity responded that Comet acts only with users’ permission, using credentials stored on their own devices. It also accused Amazon of trying to block consumer choice in AI assistants.

An earlier injunction has now been reversed

In March, a federal judge granted Amazon a preliminary injunction, finding that the company had produced strong evidence that Perplexity likely violated federal and California computer fraud laws by accessing password-protected Amazon accounts without Amazon’s permission.

That order temporarily stopped Comet from shopping on Amazon while the lawsuit moved ahead.

The broader case is still ongoing

The underlying lawsuit has not been resolved. Even so, the appellate ruling offers an early look at how courts may approach AI agents that act on behalf of users.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
570

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.