Searchable NYC Property Database Sparks Privacy Backlash From Crypto Industry Figures

Searchable NYC Property Database Sparks Privacy Backlash From Crypto Industry Figures

N
News Editor
2026-07-27 21:05:05
A searchable database built from New York City public property assessment records is facing criticism from several well-known voices in the crypto industry, who argue that organizing the data into an easy-to-search format makes it far simpler to identify wealthy property owners and where they live. The dispute is not over whether the records were public in the first place, critics say, but over the way they were aggregated and distributed. Uniswap founder Hayden Adams described the project as the worst case of mass doxxing he had seen, while Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz said it turned scattered records into a centralized tool that singled out affluent residents. Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter tied the issue to a rise in crypto-related kidnappings and violent attacks. Their comments come as verified “wrench attacks” against crypto holders continue to climb, with CertiK reporting 72 such incidents in 2025 and 52 more in the first half of 2026 alone, alongside sharply higher financial exposure.
New York Cityproperty databaseprivacycrypto securityHayden AdamsMert MumtazNic CarterCertiK

A searchable database built from New York City public property assessment records is drawing backlash from prominent figures in the crypto industry, who say the project makes it much easier to identify wealthy property owners and could expose them to physical danger.

Searchable NYC Property Database Sparks Privacy Backlash From Crypto Industry Figures 2

Criticism focuses on how public records were organized

The dispute centers on data published by the New York City Department of Finance, which each year releases assessed values used to calculate property taxes for every property in the city. The agency’s FY2027 assessment roll, supplemental market value data, and property tax guides are available through the city’s Open Data portal.

Critics on X said the issue is not that the records were public, but that they were aggregated and turned into a searchable database that makes identifying owners of expensive properties far easier.

Hayden Adams calls the database dangerous

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams called it “the worst mass doxxing I’ve ever seen,” saying the database listed nearly every unit in some luxury apartment buildings, including primary residences of people he knows. He argued that the project cast too wide a net and called it “incredibly dangerous.”

“Not only were their units listed, but nearly every unit in the entire building was listed,” Adams wrote. “They clearly took an incredibly expansive view of ‘could be’ and just doxxed a huge percentage of all expensive apartments in New York City.”

He said the city had published a list of all properties, along with the names of owners, that could be subject to the new pied a terre tax in what he described as a very easy-to-search Excel sheet.

“The city published a list of all properties -- and the names of the owners -- that *could be* subject to the new pied a terre tax in a very easy to search Excel sheet.”

Mert Mumtaz says the line was crossed

Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz called the database “unsettling” and said it crossed a line by turning scattered public records into a centralized resource that effectively singled out wealthy individuals.

“While this data was largely public prior to this in a messy way they have cleaned it, organized it, singled out ‘the rich,’ and mass distributed it only the 50th sign this year of privacy continuing to become scarcer,” he wrote.

Nic Carter links the issue to real-world attacks

Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter warned that an easily searchable database of affluent property owners could make potential victims easier to identify. On X, he pointed to recent crypto-related kidnappings and violent attacks in Europe.

“So this is a list of wealthy people and their addresses. As we’ve seen in France and Sweden this leads to crypto kidnappings, torturings and murders,” Carter wrote. “Yes real estate records are semi public but this is an easily searchable database and target list.”

Backlash comes as wrench attacks keep rising

The criticism comes as physical, or “wrench,” attacks against cryptocurrency holders continue to rise. Reported incidents have included kidnappings, torture, home invasions, and sexual assaults.

In February, blockchain security firm CertiK reported 72 verified crypto wrench attacks worldwide in 2025, up 75% from the previous year, with losses exceeding $40.9 million.

In April, French authorities charged 88 suspects, including more than 10 minors, in a broad crackdown on violent crypto kidnappings. In May, U.S. prosecutors indicted three men accused of carrying out a series of armed home invasions across California that allegedly stole millions of dollars in cryptocurrency. In June, two Texas brothers pleaded guilty to kidnapping a Minnesota family and forcing the victims to transfer more than $8 million in crypto.

By July, CertiK said attackers had already carried out 52 verified crypto wrench attacks in the first half of 2026, while recorded financial exposure had jumped nearly twelvefold year over year to $124 million.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.