Solmate’s Solana Treasury Shift Sparks Lawsuit as Market Value Slides 98%

Solmate’s Solana Treasury Shift Sparks Lawsuit as Market Value Slides 98%

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-22 10:32:13
Solmate’s Solana-focused treasury push has been hit by a shareholder lawsuit over alleged dilution and conflicted transactions, while asset sales, losses, and a reverse split add pressure to the company’s crypto transition.
SolanaSolmateshareholder lawsuittreasury strategyNasdaq

Solmate Infrastructure’s $300 million Solana treasury initiative has been overshadowed by a shareholder dispute, placing its crypto pivot under legal and corporate pressure. The plan was backed by ARK Invest, Abu Dhabi-based Pulsar Group, RockawayX, and the Solana Foundation, with the company aiming to build crypto operations in the United Arab Emirates. The report also says Solmate has lost 98% of its market value.

Derivative suit targets executives and board members

RBCH Ltd., an entity linked to RockawayX founder Viktor Fischer, filed a derivative lawsuit in New York against Solmate executives and board members. The complaint accuses them of breaching fiduciary duties, oppressing shareholders, and engaging in conflicted transactions. In a derivative case, a shareholder brings claims on behalf of the company, arguing that the company itself was harmed.

According to RBCH, CEO Ron Sade and board member Keren Maimon bought about 2.3 million newly issued shares at $4.97 per share, diluting existing shareholders by roughly 20%. RBCH says it owns more than 10% of Solmate’s capital and argues that the share issuance took place before another investment proposal was rejected. That offer, from Forward Industries, valued the company at $7.19 per share. RBCH is asking the court to suspend voting rights tied to the disputed issuance and reverse the transaction.

Dispute intensifies ahead of the June 26 meeting

Solmate rejected the allegations and said the lawsuit grew out of a failed business negotiation rather than evidence of misconduct. Management said it was acting to protect shareholders against what it described as a “fraudulent campaign” connected to Fischer and RockawayX.

RBCH answered by accusing Solmate of issuing false and misleading statements. The confrontation escalated before the company’s June 26 annual general meeting in Abu Dhabi, where RBCH urged shareholders to vote against the reelection of Ron Sade and Keren Maimon to the board.

Asset sales and listing measures show wider strain

Legal friction is only one part of the picture. Solmate has also been shrinking its older football-related operations, closing businesses in Mozambique and Mongolia and selling its stake in Italy’s Juve Stabia club for 1 euro together with a debt transfer.

The company reported an approximate 2025 net loss of 378,000 euros. To maintain its Nasdaq listing, it also carried out a 1-for-10 reverse stock split. Those steps point to broader financial strain as Solmate tries to reposition itself around a crypto treasury model.

Forward Industries’ SOL transfer revives treasury debate

During the dispute, Forward Industries reportedly moved 455,784 SOL to Coinbase Prime earlier this month, valued at about $31.87 million at the time. That transfer brought fresh attention to the company’s wider crypto treasury strategy and renewed discussion about its position as one of the larger institutional holders of Solana.

With litigation, dilution claims, asset disposals, and a reverse split all unfolding at once, Solmate’s move into a Solana-centered treasury structure remains under scrutiny from both shareholders and the market.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.