Two highly profitable Artificial Inu wallets rotate into musebook, posting about $13,800 in unrealized gains

Two highly profitable Artificial Inu wallets rotate into musebook, posting about $13,800 in unrealized gains

N
News Editor
2026-09-22 06:57:42
GMGN data tracked a sharp divergence between two Robinhood on-chain tokens over the past 24 hours. Artificial Inu (AI), paired with NVDA, fell about 13.29% and stood at a market capitalization of roughly $234 million. Over the same period, musebook, paired with META, climbed about 265.25%, lifting its market value to around $24 million. During that move, two wallets that had previously generated a combined profit of about $1.3829 million on AI opened fresh musebook positions worth about $25,200 in total. As of publication, those new positions were showing combined unrealized gains of about $13,800. One wallet beginning with 0xa581 spent about $21,500 across four trades to buy roughly 125.33 million musebook tokens, while another beginning with 0x1bd5 re-entered the token with about $3,709 across four trades after having fully exited on Sept. 19. BlockBeats noted that Memecoin trading is highly volatile and often driven by market sentiment and narrative speculation, warning investors to pay attention to risk.

According to GMGN monitoring cited by BlockBeats on Sept. 22, Artificial Inu (AI), a Robinhood on-chain token paired with NVDA, fell about 13.29% over the past 24 hours, leaving its market capitalization at roughly $234 million. Over the same stretch, musebook, a token paired with META, rose about 265.25% and reached a market capitalization of around $24 million.

During that period, two wallet addresses that had previously recorded combined profits of about $1.3829 million on AI deployed a total of about $25,200 into musebook. By the time of publication, the two new positions were showing combined unrealized gains of about $13,800.

Wallet starting with 0xa581 opened a roughly $21,500 musebook position

The address beginning with 0xa581 had cumulatively invested about $17,400 in AI and has so far recorded total profit of about $414,600, equal to a return of about 2,382.74%. Of that amount, about $134,900 was realized profit.

Between 03:55 and 05:28 today, the wallet used four transactions to build a new musebook position worth about $21,500. It bought roughly 125.33 million tokens at an average price of about $0.00017162, corresponding to a market capitalization of around $17.16 million. The position is currently showing an unrealized gain of about $7,879, or roughly 35.63%.

Its other main holdings include about $95,000 in ORBIO and about $27,800 in UBIK.

Wallet starting with 0x1bd5 re-entered musebook

Another address beginning with 0x1bd5 had cumulatively invested about $30,600 in AI and has so far recorded total profit of about $968,200, equal to a return of about 3,167.18%. Most of that profit came from unrealized gains.

The wallet had fully exited musebook on Sept. 19, then re-entered today between 01:26 and 01:33 through four transactions. It spent about $3,709 to buy roughly 40.4727 million tokens at an average price of about $0.00009165, corresponding to a market capitalization of around $9.16 million. This round of positions is currently showing an unrealized gain of about $5,939, or roughly 158.52%.

Its other main holding is CASHCAT.

BlockBeats added that Memecoin trading is highly volatile, often relying on market sentiment and narrative-driven speculation rather than practical value or use cases, and said investors should pay attention to risk.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
100

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.