U.S. Senate Fails to Advance Crypto Market Structure Bill After Ethics Dispute

U.S. Senate Fails to Advance Crypto Market Structure Bill After Ethics Dispute

N
News Editor
2026-09-16 01:33:42
The U.S. Senate failed to move forward with the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act after the proposal secured only 49 votes, well short of the 60 needed to advance legislation in the chamber. According to CoinDesk, the breakdown came after sharp bipartisan disagreements over ethics limits tied to President Donald Trump’s cryptocurrency holdings. Democratic Senator Mark Warner and others argued that the bill did not do enough to stop senior government officials from using public office to benefit their own crypto positions. Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis said she had already made the biggest concessions possible to Democrats and that the package even included what she described as unprecedented ethics restrictions aimed at Trump, but Democrats still refused to cooperate and pushed for additional demands. The report also noted that the bill had previously faced industry resistance. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong had opposed the way it handled stablecoin rewards programs, which at one point slowed the legislation’s progress. Even after the failed vote, Republican Senator John Kennedy said the measure could still return for discussion during a future lame-duck session of Congress.

According to CoinDesk, the U.S. Senate failed to pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act after the proposal won only 49 votes, far below the 60-vote threshold needed to advance legislation in the chamber. The result marked a setback for a years-long effort led by senior senators.

The vote fell short of the Senate threshold

The bill did not clear the procedural bar required to move ahead. CoinDesk said support stopped at 49 votes, leaving the measure well short of the number needed for further action.

Trump crypto holdings became the central point of conflict

The main reason the negotiations collapsed was a sharp bipartisan dispute over ethics restrictions tied to President Donald Trump’s cryptocurrency holdings.

Democratic Senator Mark Warner and others said the bill failed to effectively prevent senior government officials from using their positions to profit from their own crypto assets.

Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis said she had already offered Democrats the maximum concessions possible. She added that the bill even included what she described as an unprecedented ethics agreement aimed at Trump, yet Democrats still would not cooperate and tried to add more demands.

Support shifted after Republican leaders ended negotiations

After Republican leadership ended negotiations and pushed the vote forward, several Democratic senators who had previously backed the bill switched to opposing it, and the measure failed.

The bill had also faced pressure from the industry

Beyond the political fight in Congress, the proposal had already run into industry resistance. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong had opposed the bill over how it treated stablecoin rewards programs, a dispute that had earlier slowed its progress.

It may return in a lame-duck session

Despite the failed effort, Republican Senator John Kennedy told the media that the legislation could still be discussed again during a future lame-duck session of Congress.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
2000

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.