What You Buy on CEX Is Not Real US Stocks: The Five-Layer Equity Evaporation and Alpaca's 94% Settlement Monopoly

What You Buy on CEX Is Not Real US Stocks: The Five-Layer Equity Evaporation and Alpaca's 94% Settlement Monopoly

N
News Editor
2026-06-29 16:01:21
本文拆解加密交易所提供的美股产品本质,指出其通过传统API、代币化和永续合约三条路径实现差异化权益暴露,并非真实美股所有权。重点揭示代币化模式下五层架构导致投票权蒸发、分红契约化及SIPC保护失效,并揭露Alpaca垄断94%清算托管所引发的流动性断层与风险转嫁问题。

Three Paths: How CEXs Offer US Stock Exposure

Crypto exchanges (CEXs) advertise US stock trading, but users do not obtain genuine ownership of the underlying equities. The exposure is delivered through three distinct paths: traditional API integration, tokenized synthetic assets, and perpetual contracts. Under the traditional API model, the exchange acts as an intermediary executing real stock trades, granting users only contractual claims. Tokenized assets map US stocks onto blockchain tokens, divorcing ownership from the underlying. Perpetual contracts are pure price bets with no asset backing.

The Five-Layer Architecture and Equity Evaporation in Tokenized Models

Tokenized stocks pass through a five-layer structure: underlying US stocks → custodian → issuer → liquidity pool → end user. Each layer dilutes user rights: voting rights vanish entirely, dividends are converted into contractual payments governed by smart contracts, and SIPC insurance protection is voided. Should any intermediary fail, users face the risk of non-redemption. The cumulative effect is a complete evaporation of the equity rights that a direct stockholder would enjoy.

Alpaca's 94% Settlement Monopoly and Liquidity Disconnect

Data reveals that Alpaca alone controls 94% of the settlement and custody market for tokenized US stocks. This extreme centralization creates a severe liquidity disconnect and risk transfer problem: if Alpaca experiences technical failures or regulatory crackdowns, a massive portion of tokenized assets become unreedemable or unliquidatable. The tokens held by users would instantly lose their underlying backing. Exchange risk controls are inadequate to cover such systemic counterparty risk, leaving retail investors exposed to hidden vulnerabilities.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
400

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.