Zano Targets Trustless Cross-Chain Bridge for Native ZANO After Hard Fork 6

Zano Targets Trustless Cross-Chain Bridge for Native ZANO After Hard Fork 6

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-08 19:08:15
Zano plans to launch a trustless, non-custodial bridge for native ZANO in Q2 2026 through Hard Fork 6, enabling access to EVM, TON, and Solana while replacing its current centralized wrapped-token setup.
Zanocross-chain bridgeHard Fork 6privacy coinDeFi

Zano is preparing a major infrastructure upgrade that could significantly expand access to its native asset across external blockchain ecosystems. According to the project, Hard Fork 6, scheduled for the second quarter of 2026, will introduce a trustless, non-custodial bridge for native ZANO, allowing it to move into EVM networks, TON, and Solana. The rollout is designed to replace the project’s current wrapped-asset system, which relies on a centrally managed bridge and therefore carries a single point of failure and custody risk.

At present, Zano already has a wrapped version of its token on Ethereum known as wZANO, issued as an ERC-20 asset and managed by the core team. That arrangement gives users access to external blockchain environments, but it depends on centralized server infrastructure and requires users to trust a custodian with the underlying funds. Hard Fork 6 is meant to remove that dependency by moving the bridge design toward a protocol-based model instead of a team-controlled one.

Gateway Addresses Form the Core of the Upgrade

The key change is the introduction of a new address type called gateway addresses. Unlike the standard UTXO-style structure used more broadly in Zano, these addresses are account-based and built for large-scale programmatic interaction. In practical terms, when a user sends native ZANO through the upcoming Bridgeless protocol, the tokens are locked on the Zano side inside a gateway address. On the destination chain, an equivalent amount of wZANO is minted 1:1 and delivered to the user’s wallet.

The reverse process works in the opposite direction. If a user wants to return to the Zano network, the wrapped asset is burned on the destination chain, and the original native ZANO is unlocked on the Zano side. The project says every wrapped token in circulation will be backed by native ZANO on a one-to-one basis, making the bridge model easier to audit conceptually than a discretionary custody structure.

This mechanism matters because it changes who, or rather what, controls the locked funds. Zano’s framing is that the protocol retains control instead of an individual operator or a centralized bridge administrator. That distinction is central to the trustless claim behind the upgrade.

Threshold Signatures Replace Single-Party Control

Bridgeless is designed around a decentralized validator network using Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS). Rather than granting authority to one server or one organization, the protocol relies on threshold signatures. Under that model, no single validator ever possesses the complete private key required to authorize a cross-chain transfer. Instead, a threshold of validators must cooperate to sign operations.

That architecture aims to remove the most familiar weakness of traditional bridges: concentrated control over assets. Many bridge failures in the broader crypto market have been linked either to centralized custody, vulnerable server infrastructure, or insufficiently decentralized validation systems. Zano’s proposed design attempts to reduce those risks by distributing authority across multiple validators and embedding the movement logic into smart contracts on the destination chains.

On the EVM, TON, and Solana sides, deposits and withdrawals are expected to be handled through smart contracts rather than a central bridge server. For users, the promised result is a path to move value across ecosystems without handing custody to the team that developed the token.

Privacy Trade-Offs Are Explicit

Zano has long positioned itself around privacy, and the bridge announcement makes clear that privacy characteristics will differ depending on where the asset resides. The project notes that gateway addresses are transparent by design. That means the amounts moving through those addresses can be seen on-chain. However, Zano says the sender’s identity remains shielded through the network’s existing privacy tools, including stealth addresses and ring signatures, which obscure user addresses and make it difficult for outside observers to determine which output was spent.

Still, the project does not suggest that privacy remains intact after bridging into a public blockchain environment. Once a user holds wZANO on Ethereum, Solana, or TON, that balance becomes visible in the same way that any standard token balance on those networks is visible. In other words, bridging out of the Zano native environment introduces transparency as a trade-off for interoperability and access to broader liquidity.

According to the project’s description, users can regain Zano’s full native privacy properties by bridging back from wZANO into native ZANO. This creates a layered user experience: private at the native layer, more transparent when moving into public smart contract ecosystems, and private again when returning to the base network.

Strategic Access to Exchanges and DeFi

Beyond the technical redesign, the bridge has important market implications. Zano notes that its native token has faced resistance from some major trading platforms because its transactions are private by default. Privacy-focused assets often face additional listing hurdles due to compliance concerns. A transparent wrapped version, however, may encounter fewer obstacles because it behaves more like a standard token in public smart contract environments.

That difference could be meaningful for both centralized and decentralized markets. On centralized venues, a more transparent representation of ZANO may be easier to evaluate under exchange listing frameworks. On decentralized platforms, wZANO could become directly usable in lending protocols, yield strategies, and liquidity pools. The project specifically points to the possibility that a wZANO liquidity pool on Uniswap could replace its current custodial setup with a non-custodial equivalent once the new architecture is fully deployed.

For Zano, then, Hard Fork 6 is not being presented as a narrow backend update. It is positioned as infrastructure that could expand where ZANO trades, how it is used in DeFi, and how new users reach the network.

Base and Coinbase Could Provide a Fiat On-Ramp

Another notable part of the rollout involves Base. Zano says that launching wZANO on Base forms part of its deployment strategy, and that this could create a simpler onboarding path for newcomers. Because tokens in the Base ecosystem can be purchased with fiat through the Coinbase app, users may be able to buy wZANO using traditional payment methods, withdraw it to a wallet, and then convert it into native ZANO in a relatively small number of steps.

This matters because one of the practical barriers to adoption for privacy-oriented projects is access. If users need specialized exchanges or extra operational complexity to obtain an asset, growth can slow. By contrast, an ERC-20-compatible version of ZANO on a widely used chain can fit more naturally into existing retail and DeFi workflows.

As a standard token, wZANO can also interact with the usual smart contract stack: borrowing, lending, market making, and yield optimization. That functionality does not replicate native privacy, but it does open distribution and utility channels that a self-contained privacy coin often cannot access directly.

Still in Alpha, With Testnet Already Live

Zano says the Bridgeless platform is currently in an alpha proof-of-concept stage, and its native BRIDGE token has not yet been listed. So while the architectural direction is clear, the system remains in development rather than production maturity. The project also states that a testnet for gateway addresses is already live, putting the initiative on an active path toward the targeted Q2 2026 hard fork.

That timeline gives the team a runway to validate both the bridge flow and the user experience before the network-level upgrade arrives. It also gives the market time to assess whether the model can balance privacy, interoperability, and compliance-sensitive accessibility in a way that broadens adoption without undermining Zano’s core identity.

What Hard Fork 6 Could Mean for Zano

If the rollout proceeds as described, Hard Fork 6 could become one of the most consequential upgrades in Zano’s roadmap. It would not simply create another wrapped asset. Instead, it would connect the project’s native token to major external ecosystems through a bridge structure intended to remove centralized custody, while preserving privacy features at the native layer and offering a transparent form factor where interoperability is required.

The design also reflects a broader trend in crypto infrastructure: users increasingly want both privacy and composability, but those goals often conflict across chains and applications. Zano’s answer is not to preserve identical privacy assumptions everywhere. Rather, it appears to be building a model in which users choose the environment that fits their needs—private when held natively, transparent when deployed into public DeFi, and reversible through a structured bridge back to the original chain.

For now, the key facts remain straightforward: Zano is targeting Q2 2026 for Hard Fork 6, the upgrade is expected to introduce gateway addresses and the Bridgeless trustless bridge, and the first networks in focus are EVM chains, TON, and Solana. If successful, the change could expand liquidity access, reduce bridge custody risk, and provide a new route for ZANO to reach both exchanges and on-chain financial applications.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
400

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.