A dispute around Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110, or BIP-110, is drawing attention in the Bitcoin community after the proposal sought to restrict non-financial data stored on the Bitcoin blockchain. Supporters of the proposal have been looking to push the rule change through a user-activated soft fork, or UASF, but miner backing is still well short of the activation threshold mentioned in the report. The debate has raised questions over whether it could turn into a broader governance split inside the Bitcoin network. Blockstream CEO Adam Back criticized arguments made by BIP-110 supporters in a post on X. He said the claim that “Bitcoin supports spam” is wrong and argued that no Bitcoin participant likes spam data on the network. Back also said Bitcoin cannot achieve absolute censorship at the mathematical level. In his view, BIP-110 has multiple flaws, would not operate effectively, and has therefore failed to win network consensus. He added that trying to push through rule changes without consensus could end in a split resembling Bitcoin SV, or BSV.

According to a ChainCatcher report, Blockstream CEO Adam Back has come out against BIP-110 supporters, dismissing the idea that Bitcoin supports spam as incorrect. He said all Bitcoin participants dislike spam on the network. Back argued that Bitcoin cannot achieve absolute censorship at the mathematical level, and that the BIP-110 proposal has multiple flaws, cannot run effectively, and has not gained network consensus. Back also stressed that forcing rule changes without consensus could end in a fork similar to Bitcoin SV (BSV). The controversy around BIP-110 dates back to its plan to restrict non-financial data storage on the Bitcoin blockchain. Supporters of the proposal wanted to implement it through a user-activated soft fork (UASF). Miner support at the current stage is still far from the threshold needed for activation. Market participants are now watching to see whether the dispute turns into a wider governance split in the Bitcoin network.

Crypto market sees mild recovery on March 11 with BTC back above $70,000, but Fear & Greed Index remains at 15 (Extreme Fear). BSV leads gainers with 26% jump, while DeXe and Filecoin drop the most.

Bitcoin SV emerged from the 2018 Bitcoin Cash fork. This article reviews BSV’s positioning, fee and scaling model, and compares seven commonly cited wallets including Exodus, Coinomi, HandCash, Centbee, ElectrumSV, and Bitpie.

Pair trading is a market-neutral strategy that profits by going long and short on correlated crypto assets. This guide covers principles, examples (EOS/ETH, BTC/BSV), and risks such as execution and correlation breakdown.

South Korea is moving faster on a won-pegged stablecoin after about $115 billion flowed into dollar-backed tokens in 2025, prompting concerns over FX stability, monetary policy, and cross-border reporting.

Bitcoin Cash forked from Bitcoin in 2017 to tackle scalability by raising block size to 32MB. This article covers its origin, tech (PoW, SHA-256, 32MB blocks), use cases (payments, merchant adoption), and the CashTokens upgrade.

Despite over 15,000 cryptocurrencies listed on various platforms, most lack trading volume and real-world use. Only a tiny fraction—less than 1%—hold any significant influence.