Institutional Crypto Custody Guide Focuses on Safekeeping, Signing Rights, and Collateral Sale Authority
TheDefiant says institutional crypto custody should be assessed by separating control functions rather than looking only at where tokens are held. In its guide, the outlet notes that keeping tokens with a bank does not prevent those assets from being pledged for a loan. It also says firms comparing custody services should distinguish among three areas: safekeeping of assets, signing permissions, and the authority to sell collateral before making side-by-side evaluations. The piece frames those roles as central to understanding how institutional custody arrangements actually work and where control sits within a given setup.







