Report says Anthropic wants Google to replace optical switching in next TPU with an all-electrical design

Report says Anthropic wants Google to replace optical switching in next TPU with an all-electrical design

N
News Editor
2026-09-14 05:12:37
Industry chatter suggests Anthropic is pressing Google to change the interconnect design for its custom version of the next-generation TPUv9i chip, codenamed Triggerfish. The reported request would drop Google’s long-used optical circuit switching, or OCS, in favor of a full electrical switching architecture built around an upgraded Astera Labs Scorpio-X switch. According to the report, Google’s current TPU clusters use a 6D-Torus topology for inter-chip interconnects and pair that with dynamic optical circuit switching, allowing TPU Pods to reconfigure near all-to-all optical paths. That setup has been viewed as one of the clearest ways Google TPU differs from NVIDIA GPUs and AWS Trainium, and the article says Google is the only major AI accelerator platform using OCS today. The rumored alternative centers on a higher-spec Scorpio-X with 320-radix and SerDes speeds rising from 128G to 336G, a roughly 2.6x increase. The report also says Anthropic may see benefits in freeing die area by offloading routing functions, while simplifying operations across Google TPU, AWS Trainium, and NVIDIA GPU deployments through a more uniform interconnect fabric. If the shift happens, optical interconnect suppliers including Ayar Labs could face pressure, while Astera Labs could strengthen its standing in hyperscale AI cluster interconnects. The report notes that the claims remain unconfirmed.

Anthropic is reportedly pressing Google to change the network architecture for its custom version of the next-generation TPUv9i AI accelerator, codenamed Triggerfish, and abandon the optical circuit switching technology used across multiple TPU generations. The proposed replacement is a full electrical switching design built around Astera Labs’ Scorpio-X, a shift that could alter Google’s optical interconnect stack and introduce new uncertainty for the broader optical communications supply chain.

Rumor targets a core part of Google TPU design

SemiAnalysis said Google’s current TPU clusters use a 6D-Torus topology for inter-chip interconnects, paired with dynamic optical circuit switching, or OCS. That setup allows TPU Pods to carry out near all-to-all dynamic optical path reconfiguration and, in theory, pushes past the bandwidth and distance limits that come with traditional electrical switching.

OCS has long been treated as one of the main architectural advantages Google TPU holds over NVIDIA GPU systems and AWS Trainium. The report says Google TPU is also the only mainstream AI accelerator platform currently using OCS.

Industry rumor now says Anthropic wants Google to remove both Boardfly and OCS from its dedicated Triggerfish SKU and replace them with an inter-chip interconnect based on full electrical switching. If that happens, it would mark a direct challenge to a networking approach Google has built up over several generations.

Astera Labs Scorpio-X is cited as the replacement path

The reported alternative is an upgraded version of Astera Labs’ Scorpio-X PCIe switch chip, with several major specification changes.

According to the report, the upgraded Scorpio-X would expand radix to 320 and raise SerDes speed from 128G to 336G, which would amount to about a 2.6x increase in transmission speed. SemiAnalysis also said this version could be open to manufacturing by multiple vendors. That would give Astera Labs a chance to define the specification at the design IP level while adding more manufacturing sources to improve supply-chain resilience.

Why Anthropic may prefer electrical switching

The article lays out both technical and commercial logic behind the reported push.

One factor is die area efficiency. Current TPU chips need routing cores to handle network packet forwarding. If those routing functions are offloaded to external electrical switching chips, that silicon area could instead be used for matrix multiply units, or MXUs, or for HBM memory stacks. The report argues this would directly improve compute density per watt or memory bandwidth, which would be especially meaningful for large language model workloads.

The second factor is architectural consistency. Anthropic spreads training and inference workloads across Google TPU, AWS Trainium, and NVIDIA GPU platforms. Among those three, only Google TPU uses OCS. That means Anthropic has to maintain separate networking management and scheduling systems. If TPU moved to an electrical switching architecture, the three accelerator environments could share a unified interconnect fabric, reducing operational complexity and improving procurement leverage across the supply chain.

Optical interconnect names could come under pressure

If the rumored shift becomes real, optical interconnect suppliers would be the most exposed.

The report specifically points to Ayar Labs, the U.S. silicon photonics unicorn focused on on-chip optical I/O. Its TeraPHY technology has been marketed on the idea that AI training clusters will eventually move toward fully optical architectures. OCS systems also require a large number of high-speed optical modules. If cluster design shifts toward electrical switching, the growth trajectory for that demand would need to be reassessed.

Astera Labs, by contrast, could cement its position in hyperscale AI cluster interconnects if it wins the design slot. That could also give the company a stronger reference point when pursuing additional customers.

Claims remain unconfirmed

For now, the report remains based on industry rumor. Whether the claims are accurate, and what the concrete effect would be on Google’s interconnect roadmap, Astera Labs, Ayar Labs, and optical communications suppliers, will depend on further disclosures and harder data.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
8600

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.