This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.

CCI and Blockchain Association Sue Illinois Officials Over 0.2% Digital Asset Tax
N
News EditorDigital asset advocacy groups Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) and Blockchain Association (BA) have filed suit against Illinois officials over the state’s proposed 0.2% crypto tax. The complaint was submitted in Sangamon County’s Seventh Judicial Circuit Court and says the levy would take effect in January 2027. It is calculated on transaction volume rather than income. The groups argue that the tax violates the U.S. Constitution, the Illinois Constitution, federal and state due process laws, and the Internet Tax Freedom Act. They also say the rule is too vague, could lead to double taxation, and shifts compliance burdens onto residents and brokers while exposing them to civil and criminal penalties. Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger said Illinois cannot impose a tax regime that discriminates against digital commerce or adds uncertainty for consumers and businesses. Digital Chamber filed a similar lawsuit in July, saying the tax discriminates against digital asset traders.
Digital asset advocacy groups Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) and Blockchain Association (BA) have sued Illinois officials over the state’s 0.2% crypto tax.
The complaint was filed in Sangamon County’s Seventh Judicial Circuit Court. According to the filing, the tax is expected to take effect in January 2027 and would be levied on transaction volume rather than income.
CCI and BA say the measure violates the U.S. Constitution, the Illinois Constitution, federal and state due process laws, and the Internet Tax Freedom Act. The lawsuit also says the tax could create double taxation and is written too vaguely, placing compliance responsibility on residents and brokers while exposing them to civil and criminal penalties.
Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger said Illinois cannot impose a tax system that discriminates against digital commerce or increases uncertainty for consumers and businesses.
Digital Chamber filed a similar lawsuit in July over the same tax, saying it discriminates against digital asset traders.
4100
Disclaimer:
The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.
Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.
