CZ says Bitcoin does not change state power on its own, policy choices do

CZ says Bitcoin does not change state power on its own, policy choices do

N
News Editor
2026-08-27 07:37:41
Changpeng Zhao said at the Bitcoin Asia 2026 conference in Hong Kong that Bitcoin itself neither weakens nor strengthens government power, arguing that the outcome depends on how governments choose to act. He said history shows that weaker governments can at times coincide with stronger economic performance, citing the United States as an example. Zhao also contrasted the current U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission chair, who he said gave up part of the agency’s regulatory reach and saw industry growth follow, with former chair Gary Gensler, who he said tried to control everything and ended up stifling growth. Zhao added that Bitcoin, as a decentralized technology, can give individuals more sovereignty, but its privacy design has flaws because on-chain transactions are easy to trace. He said governments can decide whether to use those characteristics, warning that making Bitcoin ownership illegal or imposing a 36% tax on every transaction would kill industry development, while taxing a trillion-dollar market at 6% could generate significant revenue.

According to ChainCatcher, Changpeng Zhao said at the Bitcoin Asia 2026 conference in Hong Kong that Bitcoin itself does not weaken or strengthen government power. What matters, he said, is the choice made by governments.

Zhao said history has at times shown better economic performance under weaker governments. He cited the United States as an example, saying the U.S. government is relatively weak but still produced one of the world’s strongest economies. He also said the crypto industry grew after the current chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, gave up part of the agency’s regulatory power. By contrast, he said former SEC chair Gary Gensler tried to control everything and ended up restraining industry growth.

Zhao said Bitcoin, as a decentralized technology, gives individuals more sovereignty. At the same time, he said Bitcoin’s privacy design has shortcomings and that on-chain transactions are easy to track, leaving governments with the option of whether to make use of those features.

He added that declaring Bitcoin ownership illegal or imposing a 36% tax on every transaction would kill industry development. Governments may appear powerful, he said, but taxing zero still yields zero, while applying a 6% tax to a trillion-dollar market would bring in substantial revenue.

Zhao also said that most governments now pay relatively close attention to Bitcoin, but many countries still lack a crypto regulatory framework. Among government officials, he said, those who truly understand Bitcoin remain a minority. In some countries, older generations remain dominant in policymaking, which has contributed to a more conservative stance.

Still, Zhao said he does feel that a shift is underway, even though some people continue to hold the view that Bitcoin is mainly used by drug traffickers.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
20

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.