Techub News reported that @dankrad said in a post on X that the internet was largely unencrypted until the mid-2010s, which means a failure or break in cryptography would not necessarily bring the network to a halt. He said the internet would keep running, though it would look different from how it operates today.
His main point was that the crypto sector faces a more concentrated form of risk. According to the post, crypto relies on cryptography as its sole form of identity verification, placing the industry in a uniquely exposed position if cryptographic assumptions were to fail. The remark draws a distinction between the broader internet, which historically functioned with far less encryption, and crypto systems, whose core security model depends directly on cryptographic trust.
Techub News reported that @dankrad said in a post on X that the internet was largely unencrypted until the mid-2010s.
He said the crypto industry is in a uniquely high-risk position because it uses cryptography as its only form of identity verification. In his view, if cryptography were to break, the internet would still function, but it would not look the same as it does now.
This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan. Disclaimer:
The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.
Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.
