@laurashin tweeted a comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro and Claude Opus 4.8 in smart contract security testing. DeepSeek caught 11 of 12 vulnerabilities at $1.45, while Claude caught 10 at $7.61. The result highlights DeepSeek's cost advantage in AI coding security, reflecting growing performance and price gaps between models for blockchain code audit.
Techub News – @laurashin said on X that DeepSeek V4 Pro caught 11 of 12 vulnerability flags in a smart contract security competition, and did it for just $1.45 in computing cost. Claude Opus 4.8, by comparison, caught 10 flags and cost $7.61.
That side-by-side result makes DeepSeek’s price edge in AI coding security detection pretty hard to ignore. And it also points to a widening gap in both performance and cost between different models used for blockchain code audit work.
This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan. Disclaimer:
The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.
Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.
