ETH Beat BTC in Q3 Gains, but Its Order Book Depth Fell to About 40% of Bitcoin’s

ETH Beat BTC in Q3 Gains, but Its Order Book Depth Fell to About 40% of Bitcoin’s

N
News Editor
2026-10-06 08:34:11
Ether posted stronger price performance than Bitcoin in the third quarter, but CoinGecko’s data points to weaker market depth over the same period. Between July 6 and Sept. 30, ETH’s median daily market depth stood at just 35% to 45% of BTC’s, down from at least 60% in the same period last year. The report described that as a sharp deterioration from 2025 levels. The report said ETH, priced at $2,714.83 in the article, rose 70% in the third quarter, compared with BTC’s 42% gain at a reported price of $85,966.73. At the 0.15% price band, ETH depth was around $13 million to $14 million, a range that reflects liquidity sitting close to the market price and matters most for routine execution and larger trades that aim to avoid moving the market too much. CoinGecko added that ETH still remains fairly liquid, with most exchanges showing more than $1 million in bid and ask depth within 0.15% of spot. The report also said SOL has seen a broader liquidity contraction since 2025, while XRP’s total depth held near $30 million during the study period, though its 2% depth still trailed SOL’s because SOL continued to post 25% higher average daily trading volume.

Ether outperformed Bitcoin in the third quarter on price, but not on market depth. A CoinGecko report found that from July 6 to Sept. 30, ETH’s median daily market depth was only 35% to 45% of BTC’s, down from at least 60% in the same period last year.

ETH Beat BTC in Q3 Gains, but Its Order Book Depth Fell to About 40% of Bitcoin’s 2

The article listed ETH at $2,714.83 and BTC at $85,966.73. Over the quarter, ETH rose 70%, ahead of BTC’s 42% gain. CoinGecko called the decline in ETH’s depth ratio a "sharp drop from last year’s data."

ETH rose, but large trades face a thinner book

Market depth is a standard way to measure liquidity. It refers to the total dollar value of buy and sell orders resting within a set distance from the current market price on exchanges. A deeper book takes more capital to move. A thinner one can be pushed around more easily by a large order.

Within 0.15% of spot, ETH depth stood at roughly $13 million to $14 million. In practical terms, that is the pool of orders sitting close enough to the current price that, even if fully consumed, the move would be about 0.15%. Liquidity at that range matters most for everyday trading. It also matters for larger orders that want execution without moving the market too far.

A common market view is that rising prices pull in more traders, and more traders should produce thicker order books. The data cited here points the other way for ETH.

CoinGecko still said ETH remains fairly easy to trade. "Within this range (0.15% from the market price), ETH liquidity remains fairly robust, with most exchanges maintaining over $1 million in depth on both the bid and ask sides," the report said.

SOL is thinning too, though in a different part of the book

ETH is not the only large token seeing weaker liquidity. The report said Solana’s SOL has also seen shrinking liquidity, though CoinGecko measured it across a wider price band.

"Since 2025, SOL’s overall liquidity has contracted significantly," CoinGecko said.

SOL’s depth within 2% of spot fell from about $28 million per side in last year’s order books to about $20 million this year. The 2% depth metric captures orders resting farther away from the current price, showing how much buying or selling pressure the market can absorb before a larger move takes shape. In the report’s framing, ETH’s thinning is showing up closer to spot, while SOL’s is showing up in its capacity to absorb bigger swings.

XRP depth held steady, but still trailed SOL

XRP, which the article described as a payments-focused cryptocurrency, maintained total depth of about $30 million. During the study period, its order book leaned toward bids, with nearly $18 million in buy orders versus roughly $14 million in sell orders.

The report added that XRP’s market capitalization is about 40% higher than SOL’s, but its depth within 2% of spot is still lower. CoinGecko said that is because SOL’s average daily trading volume remains 25% above XRP’s.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.