Google launches Nano Banana 2.1 with stronger image editing and API prices cut by half

Google launches Nano Banana 2.1 with stronger image editing and API prices cut by half

N
News Editor
2026-10-06 22:46:03
Google released Nano Banana 2.1 on Tuesday, introducing a new version of its image generation and editing model across the Gemini app, Google Search’s AI Mode, Google Ads, and developer products including Google AI Studio, Flow, and Stitch. The update follows earlier Nano Banana releases that helped lift Gemini’s popularity, including a September 2025 feature that turned selfies into collectible figurines and briefly pushed the app to No. 1 in both major app stores, ahead of ChatGPT. Google said version 2.1 improves visual design, mask-based editing, and subject consistency, so people and objects retain their appearance across multiple edits. In text-to-image preference testing, the model scored 1,050 ELO points, compared with 990 for Nano Banana 2 and 935 for Nano Banana Pro. The model can process up to 14 reference images, track as many as four characters and 10 objects, and output images up to 4K in aspect ratios as wide as 8:1. Through Google’s developer API, a standard 1K image now costs $0.0336, down from $0.067 for Nano Banana 2. A 4K image costs $0.0756 versus $0.151, while batch processing receives an additional 50% discount.

Google on Tuesday released Nano Banana 2.1, the latest version of its AI model for turning text prompts into images and editing existing photos.

The rollout covers the Gemini app, Google Search’s AI Mode, Google Ads, and developer tools including Google AI Studio, Flow, and Stitch.

The original Nano Banana helped drive Gemini’s momentum. In September 2025, its feature for turning selfies into collectible figurines pushed Gemini to No. 1 on both major app stores, ending ChatGPT’s run at the top after nearly three years.

During the same period, Alphabet’s market capitalization crossed $3 trillion.

What changed in Nano Banana 2.1

Version 2 had arrived in February, built on Gemini 3.1 Flash Image. Its main feature was the ability to check Google Search before generating depictions of real-world people or events, improving the odds that those images would be accurate.

Google highlighted three upgrades in Nano Banana 2.1:

  • better visual design,
  • sharper mask-based editing, where only the marked region changes,
  • and stronger subject consistency, so a person or object keeps its identity across several edits.

In a post on X, Google wrote: "Meet Nano Banana 2.1, our latest image generation and editing model 🍌 This upgraded version outperforms our previous models across the board, with notable leaps in visual design, mask-based editing, and subject consistency to help you create more natural-looking images."

Scores and model capacity

In overall preference tests for text-to-image generation, Nano Banana 2.1 scored 1,050 ELO points. Nano Banana 2 scored 990, while Nano Banana Pro scored 935. Under the ELO system, higher is better. The report noted that the scale has no ceiling, making it a qualitative measure.

On specifications, the model can handle up to 14 reference images at once, track up to four characters and 10 objects, produce output up to 4K, and support aspect ratios as wide as 8:1.

Developer controls and lower pricing

Developers can also choose how long the model "thinks" before generating an image, from minimal to high, and can ground outputs using Google Search and Google Image Search. Put simply, the model can look up information before drawing.

Through Google’s developer API, which allows third-party apps to use the model, a standard 1K image costs $0.0336. That is roughly half the $0.067 charged for Nano Banana 2.

A 4K image costs $0.0756, compared with $0.151 for the previous version. Batch jobs, meaning large sets of images processed in bulk rather than instantly, receive another 50% discount.

At the standard 1K rate, generating 1,000 images through the API now costs about $33.60, down from $67 on Nano Banana 2. The article said the new model stands out not only for image quality, but also for efficiency and cost effectiveness.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.