Changxin Technology has not yet begun trading on Shanghai’s STAR Market, but Hyperliquid already has a 24/7 market that looks like a stock quote. On July 14, Trade.xyz used Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 framework to launch a pre-IPO perpetual contract for the company under the ticker xyz:CXMT. The contract started with a $5 reference price, offers up to 5x leverage, and settles in USDC.
After launch, the contract traded through $6, then $7.2, and later $8.64. As of 02:13 UTC on July 16, on-chain data on Hyperliquid showed a mark price of about $7.37, 24-hour trading volume of roughly $50.56 million, and open interest notional of about $23.07 million.
At the same time, Changxin Technology has fixed its A-share IPO price at RMB 8.66 per share, implying a valuation of RMB 579.18 billion, with the listing expected on July 27. Using an exchange rate of about 6.77 yuan per dollar, the $7.37 contract price on Hyperliquid converts to roughly RMB 49.9 per share, about 5.76 times the IPO price. Based on roughly 66.88 billion shares after issuance, that points to an implied valuation of around RMB 3.34 trillion. Reuters reported that some investors expect Changxin’s post-listing valuation to cluster between RMB 3 trillion and RMB 5 trillion.
That does not make $7.37 Changxin Technology’s real stock price, nor is it a valuation pulled from a private-market database. It is a derivatives price produced by several moving parts at once: the order book, an internal oracle, the mark price, funding, and price guardrails.
It is not a stock
Trade.xyz defines a Pre-IPO Perpetual, or IPOP, as a cash-settled linear perpetual contract designed to trade the market’s expectation of a company’s public equity value after listing.
The CXMT contract tracks the U.S. dollar value of one ordinary A-share in Changxin Technology, not the company’s total market capitalization. Once the company starts trading, the oracle is expected to take the RMB A-share price and convert it into dollars using the prevailing exchange rate.
Holding a CXMT contract does not mean holding Changxin stock. Traders do not receive IPO allocation, dividends, or voting rights, and the contract cannot be redeemed for actual shares after listing. What changes hands is a view on where the stock may trade in the public market.
So the market on Hyperliquid is not answering “what is Changxin worth today?” It is answering a narrower question: what do traders in this contract think one listed share may be worth once public trading begins?
Hyperliquid runs the market infrastructure, Trade.xyz sets the rules
CXMT was not listed by Hyperliquid’s core team directly. It was deployed by Trade.xyz through HIP-3.
HIP-3 lets third-party developers create their own perpetual markets on HyperCore. HyperCore handles the on-chain order book, matching, margining, liquidation, and settlement. The deployer decides the trading instrument, the oracle method, leverage limits, risk parameters, and, when needed, the conversion or settlement process.
That creates a clear split of responsibilities.
- HyperCore manages limit orders and matching, which determines actual execution prices.
- Trade.xyz sets the initial reference price and contract parameters, which define where the market starts and how it operates.
- Trade.xyz’s relayer supplies the internal oracle and part of the mark-price inputs, turning order-book data into references for funding and liquidation.
- HyperCore enforces margin and liquidation based on the mark price.
Trading and settlement are on-chain, but the pricing framework and oracle updates still depend on Trade.xyz’s market design and relayer.
The first $5 did not come from price discovery
Every market needs a starting point. In CXMT’s contract parameters, Trade.xyz set the initial reference price at $5. The platform describes it as a discretionary reference price and states that it is not a forecast of the IPO price, the opening price, or the post-listing stock price.
Trade.xyz has not disclosed whether that $5 was tied to a specific financing round, a valuation model, or a quoted price from an outside institution.
That means CXMT did not begin from a completely free-floating market price. Trade.xyz first placed a reference point on the board, and only after that did order-book trading take over. The distinction matters: the starting number came from the deployer, while the later price mainly came from market participants.
Executed prices come from the on-chain order book
Once the market went live, traders and market makers were able to place buy and sell orders in HyperCore’s central limit order book, where matching follows price-time priority.
If buyers are willing to pay more and sellers are unwilling to transact at the current level, the trade price rises. The reverse also holds. Before Changxin lists, there is no continuously traded spot market in the stock, so there is no external oracle forcing the contract to stay close to the RMB 8.66 IPO price.
That sets CXMT apart from standard crypto perpetuals. If a BTC perp moves away from spot BTC prices across exchanges, arbitrageurs can trade spot and futures together to close the gap. For CXMT before listing, there is no freely tradable spot market and no deliverable stock that can be used in the contract, so the same kind of risk-free arbitrage is unavailable.

As a result, the contract can remain above or below the IPO price for extended periods. It reflects what order-book participants expect, not a price that can be checked by spot arbitrage.
Why the market stopped at $6, $7.2, and $8.64
CXMT uses a 20% discovery bound.
With a $5 initial reference price, the mark price can move only within a $4 to $6 band. If sustained buying pushes the internal oracle toward the upper edge, the system can re-anchor the reference price at $6, which turns the next band into $4.8 to $7.2.
If the move continues, the reference can be shifted again to $7.2, making $8.64 the new upper bound.
- First upper bound: 5 × 1.2 = $6
- Second upper bound: 6 × 1.2 = $7.2
- Third upper bound: 7.2 × 1.2 = $8.64
CXMT allows up to seven upward and seven downward re-anchors. So the 20% figure is only an instantaneous band around the current reference price. It does not mean the market is permanently capped at 20% above or below the original $5 level.
That also explains the step-like pattern seen after launch. The levels at $6, $7.2, and $8.64 were not natural technical resistance points. They were contract-defined guardrails.
The design can reduce the risk of a new market being ripped higher or lower by a single trade, but it also affects how prices form. When the market touches an upper bound, the chart may be showing a system edge rather than a clean balance of supply and demand.
The oracle is not the last trade
Because there is no external stock price to reference before listing, CXMT uses Trade.xyz’s internal oracle.
According to Trade.xyz’s oracle documentation, the system first calculates the order book’s impact bid price and impact ask price, meaning the average executable price on each side for a specified notional size.
It does not simply use the best bid, the best ask, or the latest trade. Instead, it checks whether the executable order book sits broadly above or below the current oracle.
- If executable bids are broadly above the oracle, the internal oracle moves higher over time.
- If executable asks are broadly below the oracle, the internal oracle moves lower over time.
- If the oracle still sits between the two sides of the book, the adjustment can be zero.
The change is then smoothed with a continuous exponentially weighted moving average with a 30-minute time constant.
That means the traded price can jump faster than the oracle. The oracle catches up only if the higher or lower executable prices persist. Compared with using the last trade directly, this approach is less likely to be moved by a small outlier transaction.
But it also means the oracle is not an independent fair value. It is a lagged and smoothed version of order-book conditions.
Mark price matters for PnL and liquidation
Alongside traded prices and the oracle, the market also has a mark price used for unrealized profit and loss, margin, and liquidation.
Trade.xyz’s documentation says the mark price is the median of three inputs:
- the internal oracle price;
- the oracle plus a 150-second EMA of the perpetual mid-price’s deviation from the oracle;
- the median of the best bid, best ask, and last trade.
Using the median of the three reduces the chance that a single abnormal input directly triggers liquidation. The relayer is also limited to a ±0.5% move per update relative to the current price, which slows sudden jumps.
That leaves several distinct prices in the market at the same time.

| Price | Main use |
|---|---|
| Trade price | The actual price at which traders buy or sell |
| Oracle price | Reference for funding and an input to mark price |
| Mark price | Used for unrealized PnL, margin, and liquidation |
| IPO price | The real stock’s issue price, which does not directly constrain the on-chain contract today |
So when traders say “CXMT hit $8,” they usually mean either executed prices in the order book or the displayed mark price. During heavy volatility, those two do not have to match exactly.
Funding is a damping mechanism, not a hard anchor
In ordinary perpetuals, funding tends to pull the contract toward spot. Before listing, CXMT has no spot market, so funding can only compare the contract price with the internal oracle.
Trade.xyz set the funding-rate multiplier for IPOP at 0.005, while ordinary XYZ stock perpetuals use 0.5. In other words, the funding intensity in the pre-IPO contract is about 1% of the level used in standard XYZ contracts.
Funding still transfers between longs and shorts each hour, but its effect is far weaker. The logic is straightforward: the internal oracle itself comes from the same order book. If funding were too strong, one-sided positions could rack up large carrying costs during a long wait for the IPO.
Lower funding makes it easier to hold a directional view on the eventual listing price for longer. The trade-off is that the market has no strong external anchor. Funding can damp short-term deviations between the contract and the internal oracle, but it cannot decide whether Changxin should be worth RMB 500 billion or RMB 3 trillion.
External stock prices take over only after listing
Once Changxin Technology begins normal trading on the STAR Market and enough external market data exists, CXMT is expected to convert into a standard stock perpetual.
At that point, the oracle will be based on Changxin’s A-share price and translated into dollars using the prevailing RMB/USD exchange rate. The funding multiplier is also expected to move from 0.005 back to 0.5, the level used in regular XYZ stock perpetuals.
That transition may be the contract’s main stress point. If the post-listing stock price is close to the on-chain contract price, the internal oracle and the external oracle may connect relatively smoothly. If the gap is large, the mark price may jump at conversion, changing traders’ profit and loss and potentially triggering liquidations.
Trade.xyz set July 27 as the expected listing date for CXMT, with a grace period extending to Sept. 25. If the listing is materially delayed or canceled, the default settlement can use a full-period TWAP from launch to settlement. In mergers, material adverse events, or other special cases, Trade.xyz also reserves room to use other settlement methods.
The Cerebras example offers a reference, not proof
Trade.xyz previously listed a Cerebras pre-IPO contract that produced a result close to the public-market opening price. Talos data showed that in the final hour before Cerebras opened on Nasdaq, the Hyperliquid contract’s VWAP was about $354.54, while the actual opening price was $350, a gap of roughly 1.3%. Its IPO price, however, was only $185. That suggests the contract tracked expected public-market opening value more closely than the underwriters’ issue price.
One case is not enough to prove that the mechanism can price every private company consistently or accurately.
Limits in the CXMT market
CXMT carries several constraints that are hard to ignore.
- Before listing, there is no direct spot-versus-perp arbitrage, so mispricing can persist.
- On-chain participants are not the whole capital market, and prices can be influenced by a small number of large accounts, crypto-native risk appetite, and liquidity structure.
- The discovery band shapes short-term price paths mechanically, so stepwise breakouts are not purely the product of natural supply and demand.
- Trade.xyz controls the initial price and contract parameters while also calculating and submitting oracle inputs, which leaves deployer risk in the system.
For that reason, the CXMT price on Hyperliquid is better understood as a public, continuous expectations gauge with real capital at risk, not as a definitive answer to where Changxin Technology will trade after listing.
What the pre-IPO “stock price” actually is
Hyperliquid did not magically calculate the stock price of an unlisted company. Trade.xyz first set a $5 starting reference and the market rules. Traders then expressed real bids and offers in an on-chain order book. The internal oracle smoothed impact prices from that book into a funding reference, the mark price handled margin and liquidation, and the discovery bound controlled how quickly prices could move over short windows. Once the real stock begins trading, the external A-share price is expected to take over the oracle.
In that sense, the pre-IPO price on Hyperliquid is the sum of several parts: a manually set starting point, order-book supply and demand, internal-oracle smoothing, funding-rate damping, and discovery-band guardrails.
It is not Changxin Technology’s real stock price, and it is not a simple translation of the IPO issue price. It is a live derivatives market where participants are staking capital on a future public-market number.

