Illinois Moves to Delay Crypto Tax Until July 2027 Pending Court Approval

Illinois Moves to Delay Crypto Tax Until July 2027 Pending Court Approval

N
News Editor
2026-10-01 16:16:03
Illinois officials have agreed to delay the start of the state’s Digital Asset Tax by six months, shifting the effective date from Jan. 1, 2027, to July 1, 2027, according to a joint motion filed in Sangamon County Circuit Court. The filing asks the court to preliminarily block the tax and pause enforcement until July, though the judge must still approve the request. The motion follows a lawsuit brought by The Digital Chamber and the Illinois Blockchain Association against Illinois Department of Revenue Director David Harris and Attorney General Kwame Raoul. The agreement does not end the case. The industry groups are still contesting whether the tax is constitutional and whether it can be enforced. Governor JB Pritzker signed the Digital Asset Tax Act in June as part of the state’s 2027 budget. The law would impose a 0.2% levy on crypto purchases and transfers in the state, with digital asset brokers, including major exchanges, responsible for collection. Lawmakers said the measure could raise as much as $60 million in 2027, while critics argue the tax applies too broadly and could affect users even when they have not realized gains.

Illinois crypto users may get a six-month reprieve, if a judge approves it.

State officials have agreed to push back the start of Illinois’ Digital Asset Tax from Jan. 1, 2027, to July 1, 2027, according to a joint motion filed Thursday in Sangamon County Circuit Court. The filing asks the court to issue a preliminary injunction blocking the tax for now and to stay its effective date until July.

Lawsuit led to the proposed delay

The motion grew out of a lawsuit filed by the Chamber of Digital Commerce, known as The Digital Chamber, and the Illinois Blockchain Association against Illinois Department of Revenue Director David Harris and Attorney General Kwame Raoul.

Because the motion is stipulated, both sides are asking the judge for the same result. Court approval is still required before the delay takes effect.

The Digital Chamber said on X that Illinois had agreed to delay implementation of the tax and credited its attorneys at Bellementis PLLC. The group also said the delay does not resolve the case, and that the industry plaintiffs are still challenging whether the tax is constitutional and enforceable.

What the Illinois tax would do

Governor JB Pritzker signed the Digital Asset Tax Act in June as part of the state’s 2027 budget. The law imposes a 0.2% levy on crypto activity in Illinois, including purchases and transfers. Collection would fall to digital asset brokers such as major exchanges.

The Crypto Council for Innovation called it the “most punitive digital asset tax” in the country. Lawmakers estimated the measure could raise as much as $60 million in 2027.

Critics have focused on the breadth of the levy. The Digital Chamber has argued that the tax reaches users whether or not they realize any gain.

Separate challenge is also underway

The Blockchain Association and the Crypto Council for Innovation are pursuing a separate challenge of their own. On Sept. 9, they asked the same court to block the tax, arguing that firms were already spending millions of dollars to build compliance systems without meaningful guidance from the state.

Federal tax bill moved ahead in Washington

In Washington, the House Ways and Means Committee advanced the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act last month. Among other changes, the bill would remove gain-or-loss calculations on qualifying network fees of $10 or less starting in 2028.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
100

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.