Jensen Huang and Elon Musk frame “superintelligence” around power, computing and safety

Jensen Huang and Elon Musk frame “superintelligence” around power, computing and safety

N
News Editor
2026-09-30 21:00:57
ABMedia reported that U.S. President Donald Trump, through an executive order, set the policy direction for artificial intelligence around “Superintelligence,” or SI, and argued that the word “Artificial” should be removed as the industry moves beyond AI. At an America.gov event, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Tesla founder Elon Musk discussed how that idea could translate into industrial practice, focusing on electricity supply, orbital computing, data center economics and controls for autonomous agents. According to the report, Musk linked power consumption directly to economic output, saying that every 1% increase in electricity use could create an opportunity for GDP to rise by 1% as well. He said the sector is looking at grid upgrades and market-driven energy development, including fusion, fission and advanced battery storage, to meet rising generative computing demand. He also described “Orbital Computing” as a way to send computing hardware into orbit with heavy-lift rockets and tap solar power in space. Huang, for his part, described the shift from traditional data centers to “superintelligence factories” that generate ongoing economic value. On safety, the report said Nvidia is using Open Shell sandboxing to isolate agents and restrict access, while Bluefield chips provide external real-time monitoring. ABMedia also said the industry has signed a joint statement with the White House covering internal controls and third-party audits.

ABMedia reported that U.S. President Donald Trump has set the policy direction for artificial intelligence as “Superintelligence,” or SI, through an executive order. The report said Trump believes the term should move past “Artificial,” recasting AI as SI and presenting it as a new way to think about the technology sector.

At an America.gov event, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Tesla founder Elon Musk discussed what that concept could mean in practice. Their discussion described superintelligence as a kind of “superintelligence factory” that combines energy supply and cybersecurity defenses while creating economic value across multiple layers.

Power supply at the center of SI development

The report said Musk sees energy output as the core foundation for superintelligence. He argued that grid capacity and economic output are closely linked, adding that each 1% increase in electricity consumption creates an opportunity for gross domestic product, or GDP, to rise by 1% as well.

To meet large-scale generative computing demand, the industry is working on grid upgrades and market-based mechanisms that do not rely on government subsidies, according to the report. It listed fusion, fission and advanced battery storage as part of the sustainable energy options under discussion.

Orbital computing as one answer to Earth-based power limits

Musk also raised the idea of “Orbital Computing,” which would use heavy-lift rockets to place computing hardware into orbit. In the report’s description, that approach could tap solar power in space and work around the electricity limits faced on the Earth’s surface.

From data centers to “superintelligence factories”

Huang and Musk also reframed the role of data centers in the superintelligence era. ABMedia said traditional data centers are evolving into “superintelligence factories,” facilities that do more than store data and instead continue to generate economic value.

These facilities combine high-performance computing, networking architecture and dedicated cooling systems. The report said their construction and maintenance can support blue-collar work such as building and pipeline installation while also creating white-collar research and development roles that require advanced technical skills. In that framing, they become a driver of regional reindustrialization.

Open Shell and Bluefield highlighted in agent safety controls

On safety, the report focused on the risk that SI agents could introduce subjective decision bias or other concerns when operating autonomously. It said the industry is bringing in stricter monitoring and protection measures.

Huang described the use of Open Shell technology to build a sandbox system that isolates agent programs and restricts access permissions. The report also said Bluefield and other specialized processing chips are being used for external real-time tracking to make sure operations stay within safety rules.

ABMedia added that the industry has signed a joint statement with the White House, committing to internal controls and third-party audits as part of a more formal safety standard.

Key points listed by ABMedia

  • “Superintelligence” was presented as a new naming direction for AI, with Huang and Musk offering an industry-level interpretation of the term.
  • Growth in electricity consumption was described as positively linked to GDP growth, making expanded power generation a key condition for SI development.
  • Data centers were recast as “superintelligence factories” that can support local employment and economic activity through integrated computing, cooling and network infrastructure.
  • Orbital computing was presented as a forward-looking way to address Earth-based power bottlenecks by using space-based solar energy and heavy-lift launch systems.
  • Open Shell sandboxing, Bluefield-based real-time perimeter monitoring and third-party audits were described as part of a layered defense model for autonomous agents.
This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.