Bitcoin Core developer Murch said on X that Luke Dashjr should be removed from his role as a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, or BIP, editor. In the post, Murch said Dashjr was involved in BIP-110 and accused him of applying editorial authority inconsistently. He pointed to the early assignment of a BIP number to the proposal and said updates were merged quickly even though Dashjr had contributed less to BIP editor work in recent years. Murch also said problems had emerged between Dashjr and other BIP editors around trust, communication, and coordination. He added that Dashjr’s backing of a controversial soft fork that could develop into a hard fork showed what Murch described as a complete break from the Bitcoin development ecosystem.
Bitcoin Core developer Murch said in a post on X that Luke Dashjr should be removed from his role as a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, or BIP, editor.
Murch said Dashjr was involved in BIP-110 and accused him of using editorial authority inconsistently. He cited the early assignment of a BIP number to the proposal and said updates were merged quickly even though Dashjr had made fewer contributions to BIP editor work in recent years.
Murch also said there were problems between Dashjr and other BIP editors in terms of “trust, communication, and coordination.” He added that Dashjr’s support for a controversial soft fork that could evolve into a hard fork represented what he described as a “complete departure from the Bitcoin development ecosystem.”
This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan. Disclaimer:
The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.
Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.
