Foresight reported that blockchain security monitoring account PeckShieldAlert disclosed an exploit involving an OLPC/LABUBU liquidity pool on PancakeSwap on BNB Chain. According to the alert, the incident resulted in an estimated loss of about $1.1 million. The original alert was posted by PeckShieldAlert on X, with the post timestamp shown as 12:46 on June 20, 2026.
OLPC/LABUBU Pool on PancakeSwap Identified in the Alert
PeckShieldAlert described the target as “an OLPC/LABUBU pool on PancakeSwap on #BNBChain.” The wording identifies the affected venue as PancakeSwap and the affected pool as one related to OLPC and LABUBU. Foresight’s headline described the incident as an attack on an OLPC liquidity pool on BSC, while the original alert used the #BNBChain tag for the same reported event.
The estimated scale of the loss was given as approximately $1.1 million. In the original post, PeckShieldAlert used “~$1.1M” to describe the amount. Foresight’s Chinese headline likewise stated that about $1.1 million in assets had been stolen. The publicly available information in the input focuses on the exploited pool, the chain and platform involved, the estimated size of the loss, and the subsequent movement of funds.
Stolen Funds Bridged to Ethereum
PeckShieldAlert also reported that the exploiter bridged the stolen funds to Ethereum. The original wording stated: “The exploiter bridged the stolen funds to #Ethereum.” This means the alert tracked the post-exploit movement beyond BNB Chain and identified Ethereum as the next network in the reported flow of funds.
After the funds were moved to Ethereum, the exploiter deposited 633.4 ETH into TornadoCash, according to the alert. This 633.4 ETH figure is the largest precise on-chain amount disclosed in the post. The input material does not provide transaction hashes, address counts, or a breakdown of the TornadoCash deposits, so the report is limited to the amount directly stated in PeckShieldAlert’s post.
Small BNB and ETH Amounts Sent to a Dead Address
In addition to the TornadoCash deposit, PeckShieldAlert stated that the exploiter sent 0.0221 BNB and 0.0411 ETH to a dead address. The original post used the wording “sent 0.0221 $BNB and 0.0411 $ETH to a dead address.” These two amounts are the exact figures provided in the alert for the dead-address transfers.
Based on the information disclosed in the alert, the reported sequence contains three clear steps: an OLPC/LABUBU pool on PancakeSwap on BNB Chain was exploited; approximately $1.1 million in assets was stolen; and the exploiter bridged the stolen funds to Ethereum, where 633.4 ETH was deposited into TornadoCash while 0.0221 BNB and 0.0411 ETH were sent to a dead address.
Public Post Details and Reporting Boundary
The X post showed the timestamp “12:46 · June 20, 2026” and displayed 5,367 views. The page information in the input also included “Read 6 replies.” Foresight categorized the item under its homepage headline section and summarized the incident with the title stating that an OLPC liquidity pool on BSC had been attacked and that about $1.1 million in assets had been stolen.
The source material does not include the exploit method, contract-level details, any response from the project, a recovery update, or additional wallet addresses. For that reason, this article only restates and organizes the facts contained in the PeckShieldAlert post and the Foresight item: the affected OLPC/LABUBU pool, PancakeSwap, BNB Chain, the estimated $1.1 million loss, the bridge to Ethereum, the 633.4 ETH TornadoCash deposit, and the small transfers of BNB and ETH to a dead address.