Polymarket says third-party vendor breach led to theft of more than $2.5 million from users

Polymarket says third-party vendor breach led to theft of more than $2.5 million from users

N
News Editor
2026-10-29 23:54:10
Polymarket’s international website was hit in the early hours of Oct. 30 Taipei time, after what the company said was a compromise involving a third-party vendor. The platform said it had referred the case to law enforcement and would fully reimburse all affected users. Trading was briefly paused and then restored about an hour later. Loss estimates vary by outlet and analytics provider, but they cluster in the same range. The Wall Street Journal reported that at least $2.6 million in user funds was moved. BleepingComputer estimated roughly $2.57 million, or about 28.6 million POL, while NBC News, citing The Block, said Arkham estimated about $2.65 million. Polymarket has not disclosed the total amount stolen or the number of affected users. The incident appears tied to a security event at DebugBear, a web performance monitoring service. DebugBear told customers using its RUM product to remove embedded code from their sites. Changpeng Zhao, better known as CZ, said the Polymarket case appeared to be a front-end injection attack in which users saw normal trade details but signed altered transactions. BleepingComputer said the malicious JavaScript was built to hijack logged-in sessions, liquidate prediction market positions, and route assets to wallets controlled by the attacker.

Polymarket’s international website was attacked in the early hours of Oct. 30 Taipei time. At 02:33, the prediction market platform said on X that one of its third-party vendors had been compromised, that the matter had been handed to law enforcement, and that all affected users would be compensated.

Trading was temporarily paused. Polymarket said at 02:54 that the platform was coming back online, and at 03:00 it said trading had been fully restored.

Reports put stolen funds at more than $2.5 million

The Wall Street Journal reported that at least $2.6 million in user funds had been transferred out. Polymarket has not published the amount stolen or the number of affected users.

NBC News said a Polymarket spokesperson declined to comment on those figures. The same report said the incident did not affect Polymarket’s U.S. platform. Polymarket also said the attack appeared to have come from the United Kingdom and had been referred to U.K. authorities.

DebugBear security incident linked to malicious front-end code

At 02:00 Taipei time, website performance monitoring service DebugBear said it was dealing with an ongoing security incident and asked customers using its RUM product to remove the embedded code from their websites.

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, or CZ, reposted related information at 02:56 and said Polymarket’s situation appeared connected. He described it as a front-end injection attack: users saw what looked like normal trade details, but the transaction they actually signed had been replaced.

BleepingComputer said the malicious JavaScript was designed to take over logged-in trading sessions, sell users’ prediction market positions, and move crypto and other assets to wallets controlled by the attacker.

Timeline shows heavy wallet activity and emergency changes

According to a timeline compiled by BleepingComputer, a wallet believed to be tied to the attacker carried out heavy trading with the Polymarket token contract between 01:50 and 01:56. At 01:59, one official Polymarket release removed DebugBear code. By 02:05, Polymarket had switched the exchange into a cancel-only mode.

Estimates range from $2.57 million to $2.65 million

Loss estimates are close, but not identical. BleepingComputer, after tracking the attacker’s wallet, estimated losses at about $2.57 million, involving roughly 28.6 million POL. It said the funds were later split across three additional wallets.

NBC News, citing a report from The Block, said blockchain analytics firm Arkham estimated the losses at about $2.65 million.

Polymarket promised full reimbursement; a similar incident happened in June

Polymarket said it would 「fully reimburse all affected traders」. BleepingComputer said the company has not yet explained how that reimbursement process will work.

This was not the first time this year that Polymarket was hit through a third-party vendor. Decrypt reported on June 25 that a third-party vendor had also been compromised in that earlier case, allowing attackers to plant malicious code in Polymarket’s front end. About $3 million in customer funds was stolen then, and Polymarket also promised full refunds.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
1300

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.