Robinhood Chain took in $16.78 million in weekly fees while Ethereum received $2,008

Robinhood Chain took in $16.78 million in weekly fees while Ethereum received $2,008

N
News Editor
2026-09-05 03:42:38
Robinhood Chain generated $16.78 million in user fees over the past seven days, while Ethereum, which handled settlement and data availability costs for the network, received just $2,008, or 0.012% of the total, according to BlockTempo. The report said Arbitrum, whose stack powers the chain, took about $2.28 million under its expansion agreement, with $1.82 million going to the Arbitrum DAO treasury. Cost details in the report showed $1,748 was spent on mainnet gas for batch submission and $260 on blob fees, even though Robinhood Chain posted 13.5 GB of data to Ethereum over the same period. BlockTempo also cited ARK Invest research director Lorenzo Valente, who in July argued Ethereum was being paid only 0.15% and proposed a 75% / 10% / 15% split for Robinhood, Arbitrum and Ethereum. Two months later, the actual share for Ethereum had fallen to 0.012%. The article also compared fee income across networks and applications: Robinhood Chain alone brought in seven times Ethereum mainnet’s total fees for the same seven-day period, while apps including Uniswap V4, Pons and GMGN posted even larger fee figures on the chain. Market performance over that stretch also diverged sharply, with ARB, UNI and HOOD outpacing ETH.

Robinhood Chain pulled in $16.78 million in user fees over the past seven days. Ethereum got just $2,008 for settlement and data costs, or 0.012% of the total, according to BlockTempo.

Put it more bluntly: for every $100 users spent on gas on Robinhood Chain, only $0.012 made its way back to Ethereum, the report said.

During that same stretch, Arbitrum—the tech stack underneath it all—took about $2.28 million under its expansion deal, equal to 10% of Robinhood Chain’s net revenue. From that, $1.82 million went to the Arbitrum DAO treasury. Ethereum, handling base-layer settlement and security, got $2,008 in that same seven-day period.

How the $2,008 paid to Ethereum breaks down

BlockTempo said $1,748 of the total went to gas for posting transaction batches to Ethereum mainnet. Another $260 was spent on blob data fees. Over the past week, Robinhood Chain posted 13.5 GB of data to mainnet.

The report tied the cheap cost to the Fusaka upgrade late last year. That change increased blob capacity and drove down the per-unit price L2 networks pay for mainnet data space.

Mainnet costs did not rise with transaction activity

The article said these L1 costs do not move in lockstep with chain activity. Batch uploads run on a fixed schedule, so whether users make 1 million transactions or 100 million transactions on the L2, the mainnet bill stays about the same. So yes, the busier Robinhood Chain gets, the smaller Ethereum’s cut becomes.

BlockTempo also pointed back to its July report on comments from ARK Invest research director Lorenzo Valente. At the time, Valente said Ethereum was getting 0.15% and described the setup as Ethereum “selling its most valuable settlement layer at marginal cost.” He suggested a different split: Robinhood 75%, Arbitrum 10%, and Ethereum 15%. Two months later, the real split had fallen from 0.15% to 0.012%.

One L2 out-earned Ethereum mainnet in fees

Ethereum mainnet produced $2.38 million in total fees over the past seven days. Robinhood Chain alone brought in $16.78 million—seven times the mainnet number.

Across 16 L2s tracked by growthepie, total fees for the same period reached $17.78 million. Robinhood Chain by itself made up 94.4% of that total. And those 16 chains together paid Ethereum only $8,047 over the period, the report said.

Application-layer protocols collected even more

In some cases, apps on Robinhood Chain made more in fees than the chain itself. The report said Uniswap V4, the network’s main trading protocol, generated $43.68 million in fees over the past seven days, with most of that going to market makers. Token launch platform Pons collected $28.56 million, and trading bot GMGN brought in $13.38 million.

ARB, UNI and HOOD outpaced ETH

Price action over the same seven-day stretch was lopsided too. ARB jumped 48.8%, and UNI gained 38.9%. Robinhood shares rose from $104.81 on Aug. 31 to $122.11 on Sept. 4, up 16.5%. ETH was up 0.4% in that same window.

On Sept. 3, HOOD traded 51.63 million shares, triple the previous day’s volume. BlockTempo said the gains were concentrated in Arbitrum, which gets a share of the revenue, and in application-layer names like Uniswap. Ethereum, despite providing settlement, did not get a similar price move.

What Robinhood Chain was built for, and what comes next

The article said Robinhood Chain was first built for tokenized U.S. stocks. Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev has laid out a plan to move the broader Robinhood ecosystem on-chain.

For now, though, the chain’s main fee engine is meme coin issuance and trading. The report also said Robinhood Chain’s gas discount campaign is due to end after September, which leaves an obvious question: does activity cool off after that?

Questions raised in the report

Why is Robinhood Chain paying so little to Ethereum?

Because an L2’s payment to Ethereum is the cost of batch submission, not a revenue stream that grows with transaction count. Robinhood Chain uploaded 13.5 GB of data to mainnet over the past seven days and spent only $2,008, including $260 in blob fees.

What share should Ethereum’s settlement layer receive?

BlockTempo cited Valente’s July proposal for a 75% / 10% / 15% split among Robinhood, Arbitrum, and Ethereum. The real split now is 0.012%, equal to $2,008 over the past seven days.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
1200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.