Synthetic Sciences launches open-source research agent OpenScience with automated experiment loops

Synthetic Sciences launches open-source research agent OpenScience with automated experiment loops

N
News Editor
2026-09-28 11:08:53
Synthetic Sciences, a Y Combinator Winter 2026 (YC W26) company, has released OpenScience, an open-source research agent built for scientific workflows. The system can search papers, process data, write code, and call scientific databases. Its newly added Autoresearch feature allows the agent to run experiment loops on its own once a researcher sets a target, such as lowering validation loss in model training. OpenScience starts with a baseline, proposes changes, runs experiments, keeps improvements, rolls back weaker results, and uses prior outcomes to decide what to try next. Users can also define limits on run counts, total runtime, stop conditions, or constrain the scope of changes, such as modifying only the optimizer. The tool can run locally or on remote GPUs, SSH servers, and Slurm/PBS clusters, while recording the code, results, and decisions from each round for later review. In the company’s self-test, OpenScience completed 53 of 70 Terminal-Bench Science tasks for a score of 75.7%, compared with the public score of 68.1% for Codex + GPT-6 Astra.

Synthetic Sciences, a Y Combinator Winter 2026 (YC W26) company, has officially released OpenScience, an open-source research agent for scientific work. The system can search papers, process data, write code, and access scientific databases. It also adds a new feature called Autoresearch, which lets the agent keep running experiments on its own.

Autoresearch runs iterative experiments from a target

For tasks such as model training, a researcher only needs to give OpenScience a goal, such as lowering validation loss. The agent then runs a baseline, proposes modifications, and executes experiments round by round.

If a result improves, OpenScience keeps the change. If performance worsens, it rolls back the change and decides what to try next based on earlier results. Users can also set limits in advance, including the number of runs, total runtime, and stopping conditions. They can narrow the search space as well, for example by telling the system to change only the optimizer in the next steps.

Local and remote execution options

The release is aimed at automating the repetitive loop that researchers often manage manually: proposing changes, running experiments, comparing metrics, discarding failed attempts, and moving to the next round.

Experiments can run on a local machine or be sent to remote GPUs, SSH servers, and Slurm/PBS clusters. The code, results, and decision made in each round are recorded, making later inspection possible.

OpenScience also supports direct sign-in through ChatGPT/Codex subscriptions. Users can connect their own API keys, use local models, or choose Ace, the company’s official pay-as-you-go option.

Self-test results

In the company’s self-test, OpenScience completed 53 out of 70 Terminal-Bench Science tasks, for a score of 75.7%. For comparison, the public score for Codex + GPT-6 Astra was 68.1%.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
100

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.