Uniswap fee switch tracker separates governance approval, activation, asset collection and UNI burns

The Defiant said a version-and-chain reference for Uniswap’s fee switch breaks the rollout into four distinct categories rather than treating it as a single status line. The framework separates whether governance has approved a change, whether fee settings have actually been activated, whether assets have been collected, and whether UNI burns have been completed. The article focuses on deployment status and how that status should be read across different protocol versions and chains. Its main point is that these steps do not represent the same stage of implementation, even if they are often discussed together. By splitting the data this way, the reference is meant to show where a fee switch stands in practice, from approval through activation and downstream handling of collected assets, including completed UNI burns. The piece does not present the rollout as a uniform process. Instead, it frames the fee switch as a set of separate operational checkpoints that need to be tracked independently for each version and chain.