Uniswap, Hyperliquid and Robinhood Chain Are Following the Same Path: Speculation First, Infrastructure Later

Uniswap, Hyperliquid and Robinhood Chain Are Following the Same Path: Speculation First, Infrastructure Later

N
News Editor
2026-08-10 10:32:48
A TechFlowPost article argues that Uniswap, Hyperliquid and Robinhood Chain are moving along the same evolutionary track in finance: speculative trading arrives first, liquidity forms around it, and more durable financial infrastructure is built on top. The piece, written by Prathik Desai and translated by Foresight News, frames speculation not simply as noise or a bubble, but as an early market mechanism that can help bootstrap liquidity if it remains tied to assets or trading venues with lasting utility. To make that case, the article links current crypto developments with older examples from financial history, including the rise of the Chicago futures market and Keynes’ distinction between enterprise and speculation. On the crypto side, it points to Uniswap’s Pools launch on Robinhood Chain, where traders discovered pre-release contracts and drove more than $150 million in volume before the public rollout. It also highlights FRONG, a frog-themed token that became the platform’s unofficial mascot, and notes that Uniswap V4 daily volume on-chain jumped from $86.2 million to $228.3 million. The same pattern appears in Hyperliquid, where real-world asset perpetuals accounted for 52% of total volume in early July, and in Robinhood Chain, whose daily active users surpassed Base three weeks after launch, according to the article.

Uniswap, Hyperliquid and Robinhood Chain are moving down the same road, according to a TechFlowPost commentary by Prathik Desai: speculation draws the first wave of liquidity, and that liquidity can later support more established financial infrastructure.

Uniswap, Hyperliquid and Robinhood Chain Are Following the Same Path: Speculation First, Infrastructure Later 2

The article says crypto is often dismissed as a casino with no fundamentals, but that view misses how markets often evolve. Groups of traders that mainstream finance may look down on can still create deep pools of liquidity. Once that liquidity exists, more mature and compliant businesses can be built on top of it.

Speculation only becomes durable when it connects to a lasting market

The piece argues that not every bubble becomes a foundation. If speculation remains pure hype, it tends to collapse quickly. If it attaches itself to a sustainable trading use case and keeps generating activity, it can serve as the base layer for something larger.

To illustrate that point, the article goes back to the Chicago grain market in the 1840s. Futures markets were introduced to help farmers lock in prices ahead of uncertain harvests and reduce losses. But for those markets to function, someone had to take the other side of the trade and absorb price risk. Speculators filled that role.

It also cites American historian William Cronon, who described the rise of futures as a process of abstraction: grain as a physical good was separated from grain as a tradable asset. Once grain ownership could circulate through warehouse receipts, speculative trading expanded, liquidity improved, and farmers could more easily find counterparties. Chicago eventually became the global center for wheat price discovery.

That process was unpopular at the time. The article notes that the Granger movement openly attacked exchange speculators and accused them of profiting from farmers’ labor. Even so, the mechanism developed into a core part of global agricultural price discovery.

Desai also revisits John Maynard Keynes’ 1936 warning: “When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done.” In the article’s reading, Keynes was not rejecting speculation outright. His point was that speculation becomes dangerous when enterprise turns into a bubble floating on top of speculative frenzy. Speculation that is detached from any meaningful underlying asset is fragile. Speculation tied to assets with real value can be productive.

The article adds that this is not a new pattern. Joseph de la Vega wrote in 1688 in Confusion of Confusions that the Amsterdam exchange attracted both investors and gamblers. Desai argues that many exchanges began with that same dual character, even if later histories tend to erase it.

Uniswap Pools: meme coin trading arrives before tokenized stock rails

On Aug. 5, Uniswap launched Pools, a platform that lets users issue and trade meme coins on Robinhood Chain. The article says the chain was built by the brokerage of the same name and was originally intended to serve 30 million funded accounts through tokenized stock trading.

Before the official launch, though, traders found unpublished smart contracts and pushed more than $150 million in trades through them. According to the article, that forced Uniswap to support both beta and production contracts at the same time and delay the launch schedule.

The leading token on the platform, FRONG, took its name from the filename of a frog video used in Uniswap’s product teaser campaign. It was minted six days early using the same contract set. On the day the platform formally opened, FRONG had 12,141 holders.

The article treats that as a revealing moment: roughly $150 million traded a frog-themed token on infrastructure that had not even formally gone live, on a chain that was originally designed for securities trading. FRONG has since become the unofficial mascot of Pools.

Desai writes that this naturally invites speculation that the episode was meant to draw traffic to Uniswap’s latest V4 chain rollout. Even if it was not planned that way, Uniswap V4 daily volume on-chain still climbed from $86.2 million to $228.3 million, almost tripling.

The question is not whether speculation exists, but what it is speculating on

The article says the durability of a speculative business depends on the nature of the underlying asset or market. That is where hype either turns into infrastructure or fades out.

As one example, it points to shturl.c, which it describes as the largest meme coin issuance platform after years of putting speculation at the center of its product. Around 70% of meme coins on the platform last less than a day, and only a very small number remain active for more than a month.

Even so, the platform generated substantial revenue. The article says protocol fee income from January through July 2026 was $420 million, nearly half the level of the same period a year earlier. It still ranked among the strongest revenue-generating protocols in crypto, with $620 million in revenue and $584 million in net profit last year.

Hyperliquid extends crypto-native leverage into real-world assets

Hyperliquid is presented as another version of the same progression. It began with high-leverage crypto trading designed for directional bets. It then extended that trading model into around-the-clock markets tied to assets outside crypto.

Under the HIP-3 governance framework, the platform now offers perpetual contracts tied to Nvidia, Tesla, Nasdaq-tracking products, gold, crude oil, silver and equity indexes. The article gives a simple example: if oil-related news breaks on a Sunday, traders can open positions immediately, while traditional markets stay shut until Monday.

In early July, real-world asset perpetual volume on Hyperliquid exceeded crypto trading volume for the first time and accounted for 52% of total volume. The article also says that while the platform’s overall trading volume has fallen by nearly half from its 2025 peak, growth in real-world asset trading has offset weakness in crypto pairs.

That, in Desai’s telling, is the useful side of speculation. Hyperliquid took a leverage-heavy format that originally appealed to crypto-native traders and carried it into gold, pre-IPO equity and stock indexes, creating a 24/7 pricing layer that traditional platforms are now starting to imitate.

Robinhood Chain is trying to turn meme coin traffic into on-chain securities demand

The article says Robinhood Chain is now replaying the same script in real time. The team positions the chain as base infrastructure for on-chain stock trading, but Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev is described as being comfortable with the traffic that meme coin traders bring in.

It quotes Tenev as saying: “We built Robinhood Chain with the goal of being the best chain for real-world asset trading … but it is also great for trading meme coins.”

Fueled by meme coin activity, the chain’s daily active users surpassed Base three weeks after launch, according to the article. Desai describes that traffic and capital as seed capital for a future on-chain stock trading system.

He does not argue that this transition is guaranteed. Whether speculation matures into a durable business still depends on the platform’s choices. In Robinhood’s case, the company has 30 million funded users, multiple business lines and strong distribution. The article suggests that gives it a chance to convert meme coin traffic into a user base for on-chain securities.

It also notes that Robinhood’s prediction market revenue in the second quarter rose by more than tenfold year over year to $156 million, accounting for 20% of the platform’s total trading revenue.

What speculation can build depends on the asset underneath it

The article closes by arguing that speculation is often misunderstood because people treat it as inherently good or bad. Strip away the labels, and it is simply one of the oldest human instincts: turning a view into a financial bet.

In its most basic form, Desai writes, speculation is the search for liquidity around anything that can be priced. Where liquidity gathers, prices start to form. The object can be a sack of wheat, Nvidia stock, a frog video named frong.mp4, the outcome of a football match, or the probability that a presidential candidate wins.

The boundaries of speculation are set by the underlying asset. If the asset beneath the trade can hold lasting value, speculation may help build a durable market structure. If it cannot, the same money is less likely to leave behind anything of long-term use.

That is why the article sees crypto following a familiar historical pattern. Hyperliquid tied leveraged trading to assets such as gold and built a new pricing system in two years. Robinhood is using unexpected meme coin traffic while it builds rails for on-chain securities. In the end, what speculation produces depends on how much value the underlying asset can actually carry.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
170

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.