Privacy AI Startup Venice Burns One-Third of Token Supply, Worth $100M, to Quell Pump-and-Dump Allegations

Privacy AI Startup Venice Burns One-Third of Token Supply, Worth $100M, to Quell Pump-and-Dump Allegations

N
News Editor 01
2026-07-09 04:27:08
Venice, Erik Voorhees' privacy-focused AI startup, burned nearly 33 million unclaimed VVV tokens (worth ~$100M) after its airdrop, equal to one-third of total supply. It also bought back and burned the 1% sold by employees, aiming to address negative publicity from early insider sales.
VeniceVVVtoken burnprivacy AIairdrop

Venice, a privacy-first artificial intelligence startup founded by Bitcoin and cryptocurrency entrepreneur Erik Voorhees, has burned approximately one-third of its total token supply after concluding a 45-day airdrop on Wednesday. The move, valued at around $100 million, is aimed at mitigating backlash over allegations that project insiders engaged in a pump-and-dump scheme shortly after the token launch.

Airdrop Completion and Token Burn

According to a blog post by the company, Venice distributed 17.4 million VVV tokens to more than 40,000 recipients during the airdrop, which began in late January. After the airdrop window closed, nearly 33 million VVV remained unclaimed — equivalent to one-third of the total supply. Venice promptly burned all of these tokens. At prevailing market prices, the burned tokens were worth approximately $100 million.

Token burning is a common practice in crypto that reduces circulating supply, theoretically boosting the asset's price if demand remains constant. Following the burn, VVV traded at $3.53 on Coinbase, up 9.30% at the time of reporting.

Controversy and Remediation Efforts

Venice was created with the mission of providing a decentralized, open-source, and censorship-resistant AI platform to compete with centralized “walled gardens” like OpenAI's ChatGPT. However, the project faced a credibility crisis shortly after its token went live when it was revealed that some team members had sold their VVV holdings at peak prices, pocketing millions. Critics accused the team of orchestrating a pump-and-dump.

Voorhees denied any wrongdoing. In a bid to restore trust, Venice not only burned the unclaimed tokens but also bought back and burned the 1% of total supply that had been sold by employees on launch day. The company explained: “One percent was sold on launch day, with our blessing. Several social media accounts spun this into a negative narrative against Venice. To resolve any lingering doubts about our commitment to the importance of unrestricted intelligence, Venice bought back the 1% of VVV that was sold, and these, too, were burned at dawn.”

Market Reaction and Outlook

The combined burn of unclaimed and employee-sold tokens removed a significant overhang from the market. The price of VVV reacted positively, gaining nearly 10% within hours. Analysts see the move as a strong signal of the team's long-term commitment, though skepticism remains. The crypto community will be watching to see if Venice can deliver on its promises of decentralization and privacy without repeating governance missteps.

Voorhees, a well-known figure in the Bitcoin space for founding the crypto exchange ShapeShift, has positioned Venice as a bastion of privacy in an AI industry dominated by centralized data collectors. The token burn may help shift the narrative from insider enrichment to project development, but the ultimate test will be adoption and the platform's ability to compete with giants like ChatGPT while maintaining user privacy.

This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan.
200

Disclaimer:

The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.

Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.