Bitcoin market participants are revisiting the trade-off between self-custody, institutional custody, and spot Bitcoin ETFs after a firmware vulnerability in the Coldcard hardware wallet and the theft of more than $80 million in BTC. Responding to that debate, well-known analyst Willy Woo said he is not opposed to ETF products or custody solutions and acknowledged that both can help Bitcoin gain broader recognition and connect with the traditional financial system.
Still, Woo argued that Bitcoin stands apart as the only truly sovereign mature digital asset. In his view, it has no nationality and cannot be blocked, diluted, or confiscated by a state in the same way as traditional assets, but that characteristic is only fully realized when holders control their coins through self-custody.
Woo also pointed to Ray Dalio’s study of 1,500 years of history, saying stability itself is cyclical. If that cycle turns, he said, people may need reserves that can protect them during periods of disruption. He added that custodial institutions can fail and governments have confiscated assets in the past and may do so again. Based on that view, Woo said the current environment is in the later stage of the cycle and suggested allocating 15% of assets to sovereign assets such as Bitcoin and gold.
After a firmware vulnerability was disclosed in the Coldcard hardware wallet and more than $80 million in BTC was stolen, the market has returned to a familiar question: whether investors should lean toward institutional custody or buy spot Bitcoin ETFs instead of holding coins directly.
Responding to that discussion, well-known analyst Willy Woo said he is not against ETFs or custody solutions. He said both offer clear advantages in gaining broader acceptance and connecting Bitcoin to the traditional financial system.
Woo drew a distinction between accessibility and Bitcoin’s core property. He said Bitcoin is unique because it is the only truly sovereign mature digital asset, with no nationality and no exposure to being blocked, diluted, or confiscated by a state in the same way as other assets. But, he added, that sovereign property only belongs to the holder who controls their own coins through self-custody.
He also said that much of the West has lived in a safety bubble since World War II. Citing Ray Dalio’s research across 1,500 years of history, Woo argued that stability is itself a cycle. When that cycle ends, people may need a reserve asset that can protect them during a temporary breakdown in the world around them.
In that context, he said custodial institutions can fail, and governments have confiscated assets before and may do so again in the future. Woo said the market is now in the later stage of that cycle and suggested allocating 15% of assets to sovereign assets such as Bitcoin and gold.
This article was originally published by Bit.Fan. For more cryptocurrency news and market insights, visit www.bit.fan. Disclaimer:
The market information, project data, and third-party content displayed on this platform are for industry information sharing only and do not constitute any form of investment advice or return commitment.
Cryptocurrency trading carries high risks. Users should fully assess their risk tolerance and make independent decisions. All profits, losses, and legal responsibilities are borne by the users themselves.
