Price Performance: A Sharp Drop of Over 95%
According to real-time data from KuCoin, the zkVerify (VFY) token has fallen 95.85% from its all-time high (ATH) of $0.20. Meanwhile, it has rebounded only 7.34% from its all-time low (ATL) of $0.01. These figures highlight the extreme volatility experienced by VFY since its listing, with market sentiment shifting from early euphoria to current caution.
Circulating Supply and Market Cap
As of May 25, 2026, the circulating supply of zkVerify stands at 367,550,236 tokens, representing approximately 36.8% of the maximum supply of 1 billion. At the current price level (roughly $0.01), the circulating market capitalization is around $3.68 million (note: actually $3.68 billion? based on 367M*0.01=$3.67M. But previous Chinese text said 3.68亿美元, which is about $368 million. Let me recalc: if price is 0.01, 367M*0.01 = 3.67 million, that's too small. The original data: all-time high 0.2, current price down 95.85% => current = 0.2*(1-0.9585)=0.0083. Then market cap = 367,550,236 * 0.0083 ≈ 3.05 million. But Chinese version said 3.68亿美元, that's wrong. I need to correct. Actually the Chinese might have miscalculated. Let me re-evaluate: ATH is 0.2, down 95.85% means current = 0.2 - (0.2*0.9585) = 0.0083. ATL is 0.01, up 7.34% means current = 0.01 * 1.0734 = 0.010734. There is inconsistency between ATH-based and ATL-based calculations. It's possible the ATH/ATL data are from different times. Most likely the current price is around $0.010734 (from ATL). Let's use that: $0.010734 * 367,550,236 = $3,947,000 (approx $3.95 million). That's just under $4 million, not billions. I need to correct the Chinese text to avoid false data. Original Chinese said 3.68亿美元, which is 368 million, clearly wrong. Let me fix both EN and ZH to be accurate: use $3.95 million. But the circulating supply data from source says 367,550,236 with max 1B. So I'll use $3.95M. Also adjust Chinese accordingly. Let me update Chinese: 流通市值约为395万美元。Let me rewrite Chinese section accordingly. I will correct the JSON output to reflect proper calculations. However, the original Chinese I wrote before had an error. I need to ensure factual accuracy. So I'll modify both versions now.
Actually, upon second thought, the original source says "current price of VFY is down 95.85% from its all-time high" and "current price of VFY is up 7.34% from its all-time low". These two statements imply the current price is both $0.0083 (from ATH) and $0.010734 (from ATL), which is contradictory. The most likely explanation is that the ATH and ATL are not from the same time series? Or the data might be stale. Since we must not fabricate, we should present both statements as given but note the inconsistency? Or simply state the ATH and ATL figures without calculating the current price explicitly. Better: we can say "the current price is not explicitly given, but based on the provided percentages it falls between $0.0083 and $0.0107". For market cap, we can use the midpoint or avoid giving a precise number. To be safe, I'll avoid stating a specific current price and instead calculate market cap range. Let me revise both versions to be factually sound. I'll remove the specific market cap figure and instead say "the market capitalization is approximately $3-4 million". I'll adjust the Chinese and English accordingly. Let me regenerate the entire JSON with corrected data.
I will now produce the final JSON with accurate numbers.