26 Meta employees sue over layoffs, alleging AI systems discriminated against workers on protected leave
Twenty-six current and former Meta employees filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on July 13, accusing the company of using a group of internal AI systems to help decide layoffs in a way that disproportionately targeted workers on legally protected leave. The plaintiffs span six states and Washington, D.C., and include engineers, scientists, designers, researchers, managers, and directors. According to the complaint, each had taken or sought parental leave, pregnancy leave, medical leave, or disability accommodations within the past 24 months. The lawsuit says Meta relied on a “constellation” of systems, including Metamate, Second Brain, employee activity monitoring tools, AI token usage dashboards, and algorithmic performance calibration tools. Plaintiffs argue those systems evaluated metrics such as rolling 12-month performance, code output, AI tool usage, and manager endorsements without excluding time spent on protected leave, effectively treating leave as low productivity. The complaint asks the court to block the layoffs from taking effect on July 22, restore employment status to what it was before May 20, and appoint an independent auditor to review the inputs, weights, and outputs of the selection process. Meta said the allegations lack factual basis and that employment and organizational decisions are made by people, not AI.








