New York Bitcoin Dormant Address Lawsuit Faces Key Defense Over Whether an Address Can Be Sued
A lawsuit before the New York State Supreme Court involving ownership claims over 39,069 long-dormant Bitcoin addresses has entered a critical stage. An anonymous defendant said to control the wallets at issue has formally asked the court to dismiss the case. The central legal argument is that a Bitcoin address is merely a string of data recorded on a blockchain, not a legally recognized person or entity, and therefore lacks the capacity to be sued. Beyond the legal theory, industry commentary highlights a major technical weakness in the plaintiff’s case: even if the court were to award ownership rights, the claimant still could not move or control the BTC onchain without the corresponding private keys. According to the report, the plaintiff is attempting to apply New York lost-property rules and argue that the long-inactive coins should be treated as abandoned, ownerless assets. The case is significant because it raises a broader issue for digital-asset jurisprudence: how traditional property doctrines should apply to dormant onchain holdings where legal title and cryptographic control may not align.




