Exchange Security

Bitget
2026-10-05 04:43:30

Bitget Reverses Course Within Days After Security Breach as Protection Fund Covers Losses and Flows Recover

Bitget said a Sept. 25 security incident ultimately affected about $388 million in assets, but the exchange moved within days to restore withdrawals, deploy its user protection fund, and replenish that fund back to its stated baseline. According to findings cited from SlowMist and Mandiant, the attack path was linked to a compromise of third-party security infrastructure rather than a private key leak, cold wallet breach, or smart contract flaw. CEO Gracy Chen said this was the first incident of its kind in Bitget’s eight years of operation. The exchange said user balances would not be impacted because losses would be absorbed by its protection fund, established in 2022. At the time of the incident, the fund held 5,500 BTC worth more than $464 million, enough to cover the final loss figure. Bitget later said the fund had been replenished to at least $300 million by Sept. 30. The platform also resumed withdrawals in stages across BTC, ETH, USDT, other tokens, fiat, and C2C services according to a published schedule. On-chain data cited in the report showed that after ETH withdrawals resumed on Sept. 29, related hot wallets shifted from net outflows to net inflows. Bitget also reported a 24-hour platform inflow of $231 million on Sept. 30, close to its average daily inflow of $245 million in August, a sign that one-way capital flight did not materialize after the breach.

430
Bitget Reverses Course Within Days After Security Breach as Protection Fund Covers Losses and Flows Recover
Bitget restores withdrawals and sees inflows return days after $388 million security incident
Bybit CEO says exchange shifted to zero-trust model after 2025 attack
Bitget says operations are returning to normal as protection fund reaches $309M
Coinbase faces fresh security scrutiny after Ari Paul alleges cover-up of $1 billion in hacks
Bitget
2026-09-29 01:12:24

Bitget says $388 million theft stemmed from zero-day flaw in third-party security product

Bitget said a recent $388 million security breach was caused by a zero-day vulnerability in a third-party security product, which attackers used to steal high-privilege internal credentials, enter a critical management system, forge withdrawal instructions and bypass risk controls. In a public livestream, CEO Gracy Chen and Greater China head Xie Jiayin said the incident hit hot wallet and warm wallet infrastructure, while private keys and cold wallets were not affected. The exchange said user balances remain intact and losses will be covered in full by Bitget’s user protection fund. According to Bitget’s reconstruction, the attack began with two small test transfers before moving into large withdrawals across Ethereum, XRP, ZEC, BSC, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism and Avalanche. The company said it later isolated affected systems, reset internal credentials, tightened high-sensitivity permissions and added independent verification for all withdrawals. It also said Mandiant and SlowMist are assisting with forensics and on-chain tracing, while a bounty program has been launched to support asset recovery. Bitget said it will not rely on recovered funds as the main safeguard for users. After using the protection fund to absorb losses, the company plans to replenish it to at least $300 million within one week. A separate independent security report is expected within a week, according to the company.

540
Bitget says $388 million theft stemmed from zero-day flaw in third-party security product
crypto scams
2026-09-29 04:30:57

2026 crypto scam guide lists 12 common fraud schemes, from fake mainnets to account takeovers

TechFlowPost has published a 2026 crypto scam guide that groups common fraud tactics into five categories and 12 specific schemes, using the recent fake GIWA mainnet incident as a starting point. Written by Changan from the Biteye content team, the piece argues that the most dangerous part of crypto fraud is not only technical trickery, but the constant reshaping of familiar attack surfaces such as X posts, Telegram chats, Google search results, Discord verification flows, wallet history, mobile apps, and exchange recovery processes. The article details several patterns: fake project websites amplified by KOL reposts, fake recruiting and investment outreach that deliver malware through meeting plugins or coding tests, stolen influencer accounts used to launch tokens, Telegram impersonation and code theft, search-engine phishing pages, Discord wallet-drainer verification, fake airdrop emails, address poisoning, fake mainnets and fake bridges, malicious app updates, and exchange account resets backed by forged identity materials. It also cites examples including a fake Hyperliquid site that led to the theft of about 550,000 USDC and the fake GIWA mainnet, where 1,335 addresses sent roughly 767.65 ETH and about 766.25 ETH was drained. Its practical advice is consistent throughout: verify official channels, never share login codes or 2FA credentials, isolate devices from large holdings, review exchange permissions beyond just passwords, and treat every link, signature request, and software download with suspicion.

2170
2026 crypto scam guide lists 12 common fraud schemes, from fake mainnets to account takeovers
QCP Flags Bitcoin Pressure as Grayscale Says Compute Is Becoming a Scarce Digital Asset